The Keshik, no doubt about it. Cheaper, only requires horses, and is incredibly quick through those annoying mountain ranges. The only negative is the -1 defense, but why would you you be defending withthem in the first placE?
Samurais: -1 movement doesn't bother me since they still got 2 movements. only require iron to build. 4 defence points means it's like having an upgraded version of the musketman.
The Rider without question. The extra movement can strike faster and deeper than any of the others. A Rider army is C3C is an awesome pilager and worker killer.
With Samurai being IMX the worst Knight UU. The only one, in fact, where I'd far rather build the standard Knight - they always insist on defending themselves, instead of allowing the cheaper Pikemen to do the job. Invariably this leads to substantially greater shield losses.
YMMV, naturally, especially if you don't cover Knights with Pikemen as I usually try to do. But for my play style, Samurai are greatly inferior to standard Knights.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.