Save_Ferris
Admiring Myself
America won't change to Latin. The world will change to English.
Aw come on, dudes! Have some class, ffs! Tsk-tsk-tsk... People these days... Traders, not romantics.
I have a feeling they would be more open-minded if you called the language Slovakian and what you speak its Czech dialect (rather than the other way around).
Esperanto?
But seriously, make it English, everything else is just impractical.
Plenty of awesome content had already been made in the time of glorious past. It's too superior to modern pop-trash (mainly in English) to even bother to compare.
Nah, Latin maybe universally recognizable, but Cyrillic is awesomer, no contest. In case we have a unified state, we should have something unique about us in everything, including the writing system Besides, imo, Latin isn't suited for Slavic phonetics: you have to make up a tonn of diactrical signs, "szcz" and all that. And anyway you end up with, for example, the "c" in Serbian not being the "c" in Polish, and not being "с" in Romanian, Irish or English, so not much unification and no uniqueness in the end.
Now in God-given magnificent Cyrillic script, in which angels communicate in Heaven, you have striclty one distinctively looking character per one sound, no diactrical signs (bar "й" and "ё", but they are fully functional letters rather than diactricals) and a high general level of kickassiveness, compared to other scripts.
Besides, as one of the X century monk stated in his teachings, unlike the Greek and Latin scripts, than were made by pagans, Cyrillic was constructed by holy fathers, was officially approved by both the Patriarch of Constantinople and the Pope of Rome, after which liturgy in Slavic was officially allowed (first language after Hebrew, Greek and Latin). Why, oh why, didn't you end up using it anyway, silleh Moravians? We could be ruling the world by now.
Have you tried Slovio, by the way?
Foreign language classes are where romanticism goes to die.
Although that will be mainly due to America's pigheadedness than anything else.America won't change to Latin. The world will change to English.
American? Never heard of that language. Which native Americans speak it?Anyway, I support this move. We've been looking for a decent excuse to change the name of the world's lingua franca to American.
Disagree EMPHATICALLY.The problem is, euphony and ease of learning are two mutually exclusive qualities in a language The simpler it is (when you get rid of all the exceptions, archaic elements, irregular stuff, etc.), the worse it sounds.
I am sure speaking the High Elven tongue would be pleasing to our ears, but we'd probably spend 10 years of our lives banging our heads against the wall trying to learn it
Since we're trying to make the universal language as hard as possible, why not go all the way?
I suggest everyone speak Basque, written in the Runic Alphabet, and pronounce everything backwards.
Since we're trying to make the universal language as hard as possible, why not go all the way?
I suggest everyone speak Basque, written in the Runic Alphabet, and pronounce everything backwards.
Can't stand those natural sciences dudes always greeting each other with "Salve amicus".
Pangur Bán;11193979 said:In all seriousness, Europe has naturally created its own universal language: English. As ideologically pleasing as it would be to have a "neutral" language (which Latin is not), it is not worth adding yet another language to the teaching of hundreds of millions of children and costing over the years trillions of dollars. The only advantage I can see is that it would give more employment to Classics graduates!
But we should strive to maintain some sort of "high" English as our European lingua franca, so that the Brits don't have so much of a natural advantage over others (since their English is inexorably getting more and more decadent and ugly).
Pangur Bán;11193979 said:But as Europe is essentially a Slavic continent with Germanic and Romance edges
Maybe it's just to save display space, though?Pangur Bán;11194074 said:Just the other day I was using a photocopier, I noticed when I turned it on its lcd display read "the machine warms up". Inability to distinguish present simple and present continuous is a classic give-away for a foreigner using English, but is accepted usage among foreigners themselves and doubtless its usage will prevail over time as the actual semantic difference involved is negligible.
Maybe it's just to save display space, though?
Although that will be mainly due to America's pigheadedness than anything else.
This thread is a goldmine of ridiculous statements.
"I am warming up" would save time, and be kinda ballin though.
Maybe it's just to save display space, though?