@UE: yes, probably.
Being 1 tile away from the pigs also have benefits, in case we get AH sooner than expected.
The 2nd improved tile in Boston has really
high value (shaves turns growing to 3 & 4), however, so farming should be tested, I suppose. Also, chopping into the Worker during stagnation or into the Granary during growth is strictly equal,
as long as we whip the worker. We still have some turns to play before the chop becomes relevant. We just need the chop to be done by the time we're ready to whip the Granary.
Maybe we can't follow that route without AH now. Dunno.
@Our status:
Hmmm... I just noticed we followed shakabrade's suggestion (Doshin's? kossin's?) and switched from Worker to Granary in N-Y when we reached 30/60 in the Worker build...
I'm not convinced that's best. It hasn't been tested, nor argued for in a very comprehensive manner.
My understanding is that we need overflow
from the Worker whip to complete the Granary.
I'll have testing time today so I'll come back to this
(
this: not "what would have been best" but "how to best proceed")
EDIT: some more thoughts
Worker use: The forest 2W of Wash is
shared. If we have time (and I believe we have - research time, slavery revolt), then it's better to chop a forest into Boston that is
not shared. So we can chop 3 forests in Wash instead of 2.
Chopping 4W of Wash would be a good choice, imo, since it would allow two moves NW, NW out of Boston.
Build orders: if we're willing to settle our 4th by corn/furs (@Dub: I've acknowledged the power of that city already), then we should really consider
building the 3rd settler in Boston rather than Washington. Especially if the delay of AH makes us chop more. Wash could build another Worker instead of the settler and it will grow faster.
I've tested that already (t40 tests) and settler in pigs city resulted in the fastest corn/furs city. With chop(s) + a whip, it should still be the fastest way.