The fan community can always provide new graphics, like Snoopy's terrain, etc. etc.graphics, who cares? So long as its a step up from civ4, which it looks like it will be, I'm happy. I want good gameplay, graphics are secondary.
The fan community can always provide new graphics, like Snoopy's terrain, etc. etc.graphics, who cares? So long as its a step up from civ4, which it looks like it will be, I'm happy. I want good gameplay, graphics are secondary.
Agreed. I don't understand the obsession with graphics.graphics, who cares? So long as its a step up from civ4, which it looks like it will be, I'm happy. I want good gameplay, graphics are secondary.
I think I just threw up in my mouth a little bit
You, good sir, will just say everything is good with no reason. Someone could probably sell you a half-eaten plate of food and you would think you are getting a good deal.
The graphics are no better than games that came out years ago, If you are impressed by the graphics, then you seemingly are unaware that the graphics are not incredible by any standard compared to other games. They are par.
If the game runs fast, it's not because of excellent programming, it's because they have nerfed the number of units and cities... yet again.
This is a place to discuss our opinions of the graphics.. if you don't like it.. then get the hell out.
Tom
No need to be rude...
Thormodr said:More garbage from the haters. ... This mass hysteria by people who starting whining... if it weren't so pathetic.
No need to be rude.
I was merely commenting on the screen shot of the interface which looks awesome.
I am sure you or others will hate it anyway because your preconceived minds are already made up.
If you hate the game so much then go play something else. It's not a hard concept to understand.
*insert statement about pre alpha graphics yet again*
Outdated? Compared to what, exactly?
No, they're not, and I'll bet you don't have a single shred of evidence to back this up. It's FUD.tom2050 said:Having played since 1, they are drastically changing the foundation of the game away from what Civilization is. It's becoming more of a turn-based Age of Empires.
Are we really still arguing about this? Which similar tile-based strategy games are making Civ V look so inferior, exactly? I'm not sure we've had a single example in the entire thread. Show me some beautiful tiled terrain and then we can discuss where we think Civ V is going wrong.
No, they're not, and I'll bet you don't have a single shred of evidence to back this up. It's FUD.
Better Graphics = no Civ 6... that was well thought out I see.Don't you know the sky is falling? The haters go through the same old idiotic song and dance whenever a new Civ game is released.
If they made incredible graphics that only 20% of people's computer's could use then 80% of their potential customers would be SOL. The fan base would erode and potentially there wouldn't be a Civ 6. That would be an unwise business decision. Is this really a hard concept for some people?