LucyDuke
staring at the clock
Against zoning ordinances. Can't have pigs either.
You figured right.I figured it'd come across as a joke.
I agree, though just sugar really.I agree that it's disingenuous to pretend that the source of the substances in HFCS has any bearing on what it is: sugar and water.
And we're 99% monkey. Guess we'll both have to agree on oh well, whatever.Like 99% of honey. What I don't understand is why candy made by bees is sooo much better than candy made in a factory, but oh well whatever.
I thought it was a free country.Against zoning ordinances. Can't have pigs either.
I ate a whole box of them once but I wouldn't recommend it.Oreos are just superior.
What a frivorlus record.It was meant to make the ice-cream cost $25000 and make whoever was eating it break the Guinness World Record for the most expensive ice-cream ever.
Nothing, though certain brands are better than others. Just saying a hunter-gatherer might not immediately recognize it as food (on the Michael Pollen tangent), well uncooked anyway, they'd probably recognize it as food once they smelled it cooking.What's wrong with rice pasta?
What I don't understand is why candy made by bees is sooo much better than candy made in a factory, but oh well whatever.
I agree, though just sugar really.
You guys are stating something honey=hfcs without any evidence. Our Lucy's 99%=100% math. You can speculate on my motives 'till the cows come home but you're the ones making the positive claim that a=b. I'm not even stating anything for sure though I would be willing to put money on honey as being less destructive than hfcs or cane sugar if ever a large study was begun.Because it's made by bees rather than made in a factory.
Plenty of dry foods have HFCS in them.What? HFCS has a bunch of water, as does every food that's wet. (except foods wet with oil)
You guys are stating something honey=hfcs without any evidence. Our Lucy's 99%=100% math. You can speculate on my motives 'till the cows come home but you're the ones making the positive claim that a=b. I'm not even stating anything for sure though I would be willing to put money on honey as being less destructive than hfcs or cane sugar if ever a large study was begun.
Plenty of dry foods have HFCS in them.
I wouldn't recommend not sharing either. Everyone should bask in the glory of Oreos.I ate a whole box of them once but I wouldn't recommend it.
Read for yourself.Narz said:What a frivorlus record.
Narz said:Nothing, though certain brands are better than others. Just saying a hunter-gatherer might not immediately recognize it as food (on the Michael Pollen tangent), well uncooked anyway, they'd probably recognize it as food once they smelled it cooking.
FTFY.Plenty of dry foodshave HFCS in them.are made with HFCS
You guys are stating something honey=hfcs without any evidence. Our Lucy's 99%=100% math. You can speculate on my motives 'till the cows come home but you're the ones making the positive claim that a=b. I'm not even stating anything for sure though I would be willing to put money on honey as being less destructive than hfcs or cane sugar if ever a large study was begun.
I am curious why this is such a reactive issue.
"According to the USDA, HFCS consists of 24% water"
Regardless of the USDA's definition, you can find HFCS high in the ingredients of a lot of dry goods. Bread, for instance, especially white bread, and many cereals. You'll be surprised by its ubiquity.