RedRalph
Deity
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2007
- Messages
- 20,708
The current regime dismisses him as a homosexual.
Cyrus?!?!?!?
The current regime dismisses him as a homosexual.
That sounds a bit like pro-Shah propaganda; I think you'll find that the Shah's 'modernization' never reached outside the major cities. I am afraid that the rural population will back the Islamic Republic just as staunchly as the Shah's regime was hated.
On another note, as the protesters claim not to object to the Islamic Republic, but rather to the dictatorial abuse of it, I don't quite see Iran become a Western ally anytime soon. Western intervention has done plenty to make sure of that in the past...
As for Turkey, as long as its constitution is backed by the military and they fail to take responsibility for the Armenian tragedy (not to mention the Greece/Cyprus and Kurd issues), I'm afraid it does not live up to EU standards. Turkey may compain about EU 'filibustering' of their EU admission, but in the end it's entirely up to Turkey if and when it will be ready for EU membership. Within this context, a fundamentalist interpretation of Islam seems to make up a sizeable minority of Turkish citizens, as was apparent when the US Air Force wanted to use Turkish airbases to control Iraqi skies - while Turkey is a NATO member.
Cyrus?!?!?!?
The current regime even felt threatened by a cartoon-based movie about caricatured Persians invading Greece 2500 years ago. I guess they were happy, cause they found a reason to criticise an American movie...Thank you, Cheetah - I agree with many of your sentiments.
Many Iranians are proud of their long history with the Jews. Cyrus the Great is one of the most quoted in the Torah: He freed the jews, helped them build their Temple and allowed all religions in the Persian Empire to practice their faiths freely.
The current regime dismisses him as a homosexual.
It was not long ago that Iran had this. My grandmother was one of the first women to receive her doctorate in Iran.
Hmm. I'm not sure if that is correct, but a quick search of my memory didn't produce enough hard evidence, so I'll concede that point for now.Practically every government in history has at least believed it was improving it's citizens lives, this is not a western value at all, its a state value.
Yes. The current regime is hostile towards anything pre-islam in Iran. They have of course failed, as we are a proud people and will never forget our heritage and culture.
The regime built a dam to flood the plain which houses Cyruss tomb, destroyed the archeological sites of Pasargad and Persepolis, and harass and intimidate those who would gather at the tomb commemorate the International Day of Cyrus the Great.
The clerics refer to Cyrus as a "homosexual jew-lover" and when bones were discovered in his masoleum dismissed them as "bones of a dog".
The regime is demanding Cyrus the Great's cylinder from Britain, which is one of the first formal declarations of human rights recorded -- there is no doubt in my mind they wish to destroy it, and thus far the British museum has refused to loan it to them.
Yes. The current regime is hostile towards anything pre-islam in Iran. They have of course failed, as we are a proud people and will never forget our heritage and culture.
The regime built a dam to flood the plain which houses Cyrus’s tomb, destroyed the archeological sites of Pasargad and Persepolis, and harass and intimidate those who would gather at the tomb commemorate the International Day of Cyrus the Great.
The clerics refer to Cyrus as a "homosexual jew-lover" and when bones were discovered in his masoleum dismissed them as "bones of a dog".
The regime is demanding Cyrus the Great's cylinder from Britain, which is one of the first formal declarations of human rights recorded -- there is no doubt in my mind they wish to destroy it, and thus far the British museum has refused to loan it to them.
I'm very surprised by this, I thought they tried to associate themselves with the Persian Empire.
The Shah had his faults, I do not want a Monarchy again (his son currently lives in the USA), but life in Iran was better under the Shah and the people enjoyed greater equality, freedom and rights.
Really? And there was no secret police ofcourse either in those glorious days... The shah's regime was a de facto dictatorship and the Islamic revolution was not, let's say, entirely unexpected. Personally I prefer freedom over any dictatorship, but that's just me ofcourse. (I'm not saying the current regime is that much of an improvement, but that's beside the point.)
How much inspiration does the movement draw from the Tudeh Party and liberal figures like Mehdi Barzgan? Do you see parallels with the Constitutional Revolution, and the 1979 Revolution?
Oh, and to add to that:
In December, the Iranian consul in Norway, Mohammed Reza Heydari, has defected, saying he refuses to support a regime that kills and tortures its own people and denies them the right to a free election. He is currently applying for asylum in Norway for himself and his family, and the Norwegian Security Service is paying attention, as there are fears he or his family may be hurt.
He's also saying that he knows of lots of other Iranian diplomats that are planning to do the same, and urges them to quit soon.
The Iranian government of course doesn't accept this at all. They are going through all the usual stages: saying his resignation isn't accepted (and thus he still works there), claiming to the media that he has already changed his mind, confiscating his passport, threatening him, confiscating his property in Iran, having the Basij Militia visit his family members in Iran, and promising that if he comes back to Iran and denies that he has defected, then he will not be hurt...
How do you honestly think an invasion would go, Ecofarm?
That's great!I believe around 30 of Iran's foreign diplomats have already done this very thing.
...Better than Iraq. There is alot more to work with in the form of decent and competent leadership still alive in Iran than there was in Iraq.
Basket's idea that we should not invade until the situation is hopeless for the Iranians is a bad idea. It means that when we do invade, like Iraq, there will be little in the form of educated reformists with which to build a new government.
We should strike while the democratic heart of Iran still beats. Waiting for it to die before we act only makes change that much more difficult.
Do you even consider the "remote" possibility that the Iranian people may all get behind their current leaders if a foreign power invades? Especially one that has a bad history with meddling with Iranian affairs?
Better than Iraq. There is alot more to work with in the form of decent and competent leadership still alive in Iran than there was in Iraq.
Basket's idea that we should not invade until the situation is hopeless for the Iranians is a bad idea. It means that when we do invade, like Iraq, there will be little in the form of educated reformists with which to build a new government.
We should strike while the democratic heart of Iran still beats. Waiting for it to die before we act only makes change that much more difficult.
Good point. We actually didn't see a lot of that in Iraq.Yeah, sure. Just like the people of Iraq were going to rally around Saddam and fight to the last drop of blood.
Spare me the myth.