What's wrong with imperialism? :x
Nothing at all, but it would be an example of a time when white male monoculture was forced on others. Generally at the point of a gun.
What's wrong with imperialism? :x
Rape ratings can't really be compared without qualitative analysis of individual states' laws. Fx I'm not sure Swedes are more prone to rape than other nationalities (even if there's a Viking joke in there somewhere) I think it has more to do with Sweden's particularly sensitive relationship to gender politics. Many new Swedish policies and laws concern themselves heavily with gender and race. It is why they're both considered a progressive bastion and a '********' regime by different viewpoints. And sometimes their particular articulations of laws make it so that a comparatively large population segment are rapists that wouldn't be in other countries. I once looked over one of those international rape statistics and I'm not infering anything about the US here, but several developing nations have extremely good rape stats compared to the evil raping nation of Sweden; perhaps in those situations one might consider what constitutes rape in Sweden compared to say Egypt where marital rape isn't A Thing at all.
EDIT: Just wanted to put it out there. It's much easier to compare gun crime between states because then there's usually a shot wound or a dead person. Rape is a whole mishmash of statistical issues because consent is so damn hard to legally supervise.
I think that people who cite disproportionate American violence rates usually do so to exactly underline the social problems underneath them. Ie they feel a need to make the political changes you infer.
EDIT also jesus christ i suck at english
I dislike comparing violent crime rates between smaller countries and larger ones, population wise, because the numbers don't equate. You need to consider a few things. America has 320 million people, ten times Canada, and a whole sweeping array of social and economic problems Canada does not have. All of this contributes to violence rates, primarily driven by easy access to guns and not so easy access to financial stability or medical care.
I'm not sure what you're talking about. Does a larger population inherently mean disproportionately more violence? That is, if we're talking two data entries with the same population density, inequality, cultural diversity etc? Would a larger area with all those factors being the same experience disproportionate violence? Or is it more meaningful to compare to Canada taking those factors into account, and then to figure out how to be more like Canada (eg diminish the problems that come from inequality by making people more equal, etc etc etc)
darksaber1 said:Internal population comparisons are arguably why we are so low; Manitoba, The Northwest Territories and Nunavut each have a murder rate of 4.10, 11.53 and 14.84, predominantly involving poor native people with poor access to financial stability and healthcare. where the US (generally) has Hispanics and Black people at the centre of crime, we have natives. Really not proud of THAT. Also the reason for those too territories having 1200+ rate of drug violations compared to the national average of 313.
Also, Europe can send a lot of their underclass to kill and/or die in the Middle East. Imagine if thousands of Americans were flying down to participate in the Mexican drug war.
Mexican drugs wars keep american small arms mfg in the black.