Who Should Get the 2016 Olympics?

Which city should host the 2016 Olympics?


  • Total voters
    195
  • Poll closed .
Of course I'm partial to Chicago, but I'd be very interested to see Rio do the Olympics.
 
It would be cool to see it in Rio, but Chicago is close to me (2 hour distance, 6 hour drive time! Thanks, Eisenhower! :D), so...yeah.
 
Tokyo's had them. I know it'll've been over 50 years but that's still a minus in my book.

Rio de Janeiro would have a lot of work to do to clean up... the socioeconomic split in that city can't be ignored. (In before Luiz comments about the lazies in the slums voting for that socialist who doesn't help them!)

Chicago does nothing for me.

Madrid has potential.
 
Rio de Janeiro should get it. South America hasn't had a single one host event yet.

But realistically I imagine the country that pays the most will get it instead.
 
Can't have Europe twice in a Row so Madrid shouldn't get it.
Same reason for Tokyo - far east Asia two out of three times.

So Rio or Chicago - not having been to either I say Rio

I guess Obama would be in favour of Chicago - summer Olympics in his stomping ground to finish off his second term.

Either of the American options are good from a time zone point of view for me so long as the events are in the afternoon / evening.
 
I never knew 538's comments were as ******ed as those of Youtube.
 
Rio.

I like it when similar events go to countries they were never staged into. Plus, it should be winter there, therefore avoiding excessive heat.
 
Chicago or Rio.
 
Sure. Beijing got it so why not let the FREE China have a go at it. Show 'em how its done.
 
Top Bottom