Recent content by NowhereMan80

Gee, I’m shocked. All anyone had to do is play the PC version to know that it’s a console game.

Just because it's rare doesn't mean this isn't one of those situations. It feels like a completely different game with those 2 changes. It just does. A segment of the audience is going to be fine with that, and a segment of the audience is going to find it unacceptable. People flipped out about...

This game is what it is; it doesn't matter what they do with expansions/DLC/whatever this time. It's a fundamentally different game from every other Civ and you're either someone that's ok with it and future add-ons will add more to your experience, or you don't like it and no matter what they...

There will undoubtedly be a Civ 8, but this game has done serious damage to the franchise and I don't even care what they do with upcoming DLC/expansions/updates/whatever. Some people like the design choices, and that's fine. But a serious amount of people don't and add in the horrible UI, the...

Most of the game is an embarrassment to the franchise. Like I've said and will continue to say, this game absolutely should not be called "Sid Meier's Civilization 7".

I apologize for taking things seriously. And thanks for agreeing with me that it meant nothing.

The #'s they posted aren't meaningful, and they were the ones that pointed out game completion rate as an important factor in their changes to the game. I'd say when it comes to this game it's the only stat that means anything.

Interesting that one of their main arguments for changing how the game is played was a low % of people didn’t finish games (sorry, “Campaigns”), and they didn’t include that here.

I don't care for it, but the combination of the era system AND switching Civ's is just a deal breaker for me. I just don't think it's a Civilization games any more; it took too much from Humankind. And I just don't really think Civilization should be taking to that degree from other games, it...

I don't think it's unplayable or boring, it's just very different from every other Civ. People are either going to really like it or really dislike it, I don't think there will be much in the middle.

Yep, and I feel like plenty of people are going to feel this way as time goes on. As I've said previously, this game is fundamentally different from every Civ before it. It's a FAR more "mission"/"story" based Civ compared to previous titles and for people that like being guided, I imagine...

One more indicator that this game was developed for everything but its core audience. I imagine a mobile announcement isn't far off.

Yep, and it absolutely should not have been named "Sid Meier's Civilization 7". If they want to make huge changes to satiate the mainstream audience....so be it. But this game is a total reboot situation where it should have just been called "Civilization".

I couldn't possibly care less what click bait Youtubers think, eithe way. I haven't watched nor will I watch one video there about this game. Having said that, this is the endless thing with the internet that just because it's an opinion you disagree with, you're bothered by it. I'm sure you...

I wonder how a lot of people who are "liking" this new system reacted whenever they heard someone in the past say that they only played Civ up until like 150 turns and then just started over. Because that's pretty much what this game is.