Recent content by Tomcat1962

CIV4UnitArtStyleTypeInfos -> UNIT_ARTSTYLE_RUSSIA -> Double Entry of UNIT_P59. One with MiG-15 and one with MiG-3.

I won't argue here with realism, since CIV/RAND is a game and not a simulation, but i understand the idea of Unique Units as of Units that are unique for a certain civ during a certain Epoch and not all over long times.

Maceman's STR was underweighted in Vanilla, thus the strength was changed up to 10 i suppose and i agree with that upgrading. Praetorians as Middle Age Units? I doubt this, since the Praetorian guard was dissolved at the beginning of the 4th century.

On Praetorians, imho leave them at 8. Str 10 would "catapult" the unit to much into the Middle-Ages. Additional Promotion Cover I seems good for me and maybe Shock 1 instead of Formation 1 additional. But speaking of balancing units, how does the following sound to you: Raising the Str. of...

Seems that you're playing with another modmod beside of (R)AND since in RAND the only UU for Rome are the Praetorians, or do i miss something? Imho it's a bit confusing to refer to the experiences of games with another modmod used in a balancing discussion of pure RAND.

Ok. Thx for the quick reply. I think a patch would be appreciated by many people, but speaking of me, there's no need now i know the reason.

What's wrong with the Building Buttons in the Holy War-Module? The Buttons look fine in the Civilopedia and in the Worldbuilder, but in Game when you hover over a City which possesses one of these buildings, there are only the well known pink squares... Any Button-Wizard here who can tell...

No, ALL Improvements seem to be screwed, at least here (so i'd like that someonelse could confirm this to report this as a Bug), e.g. if i place city ruins 1 in the worldbuilder, i get whaling boats instead, if placing city ruins 2, i get a mine, if placing a tribal village (thats what i called...

Afforess, speaking of me, there would be no need for such a large patch... I just thought it was just a simple configuration/xml problem, so i can live with this terrain.... Any thoughts/suggestions on the (maybe) screwed up improvements?

I'll second that... It would be a pity seeing the politeness and helpfull spirit i saw here for the last months would vanishe.... There's no need to push afforess into someway he clearly said he would not go, e.g. further develop AND beside from erasing bug's. Beside from that, I've...

I'm not sure that Simplicity is the key. Let me first express that in the following i only can rate AND 1.73, 'cause this is the version i'm still playing 'cause i really like finally to end a full game with that version beside of it's possible flaws. Also, I only rate strictly from a...

First i didn't like the "strange" self-generated names of landmarks, but meanwhile i don't care. Think of all the strange names in other languages and they don't sound so strange anymore. Another question: can someone confirm, that with personalized maps, there is no random spreading of...

Are there any code changes/behaviour changes on uneven spreading after AND 1.73J? I ask for one reason: The only minor flaw/ the only minor thing i would like to see that should be changed is, that there should be a noticeable spreading along roads, paved road, etc.. Beside of that, this...

May I ask what negative game events were the reason to think about this new system? Can't think of any and haven't met any in my games. I like the current way very much and find it nearly flawless and perfect. Would this mean that, if you conquer a tile that was previously owned/claimed by...

Maybe i missed it, but is there any way to rename/edit this new landmarks?