As an intresting side point outdated Indian fighter jets won in war games against modern American jets when satllites were removed from the war games.
Which is why the USA is scared shitless of China and it's ability to missle our sats from the ground.
It's not guns vs axes that allows...
Really it's al the PC stuff that we are conditioned to belive that causes people to argue with you.
Your tone however could use some work:D
Blacks << Whites < Asians. That's how it goes. Sorry to burst your bubbles but ALL MEN ARE NOT CREATED EQUAL. Some people are born genetically smarter...
IMHO 100% agree. Early game is too important in the entire Civ series. 50-90% of the techs, choices, land, and diplo is pointless, depending on skill level of participants.
You want a real challange Blake? Try making the endgame important.
I think the point some of the others are trying to make is that the current AI implementation goes too far in the other direction. Instead of making war cost 'just right' you made war cost 'way too much'. Being on either side of it.
If a single average war means you lose so much tech that you...
I think the most useful thing the better AI guy can do, other than calling everyone wusses for not going into a pure warmonger stragety :lol: . is to define for himself exactly what he wants the "AI" to do. Win 100% of the time on emperor? Immortal? Warlord?
Might I suggest you start then to...
The problem with making the AI even 'better' is that it further accentuates flaws and imbalances in the game.
Notably and most annoying for me: Warmongering is the best tragedy. It's annoying that at higher difficulty levels it is the ONLY way to win. You must warmonger, at least at first, or...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.