Biplanes are not enough

Haddu

Haddu

Warlord
Joined
Mar 24, 2011
Messages
159
Not enough Units Biplanes the interwar period(1920-1938).

For example

UK:
Hawker Horsley
Hawker Dantorp
Blackburn В-6 Shark
Hawker Hart
Hawker Demon

USA:
Douglas DT
Curtiss Falcon
Curtiss F11C Goshawk

France:
Breguet Br.XIX
Potez 25

Siam(Thailand):
Boripatra
 
There are actually quite a few, although you'll need to dig around the Industrial Units database:

Fighters:
Delta_Strife's CR32
Delta_Strife's Fury
Delta_Strife's Gladiator
Delta_Strife's P12
Delta_Strife's R5
Smoking Mirror's "generic" 1920s biplane fighter
TopGun, Fire Fox's & Paul Clawson's Antonov An-2 (LSK-LV)
Wyrmshadow's Antonov AN-2C "Colt"
Wyrmshadow's Avia
Wyrmshadow's Bristol F2B
Wyrmshadow's Curtis "Jenny"
Wyrmshadow's Henschel Hs-123
Wyrmshadow's Polikarov P12
Wyrmshadow's Storch (yes, upper-wing monoplane, but still ...)
Wyrmshadow's Tigermoth

Bombers:
TopGun, Fire Fox's & Paul Clawson's Curtiss B-2 "Condor"

"Seek & Ye Shall Find" (As in, No, I don't have the db URLs handy ... )

-:king:z

PS I just noted that English isn't your first language: CLICK HERE to get to the Industrial units database: yes' it's quite a bit to scroll through, but there isn't any "proper" indexing available beyond that.

-O.
 
 
"Hawker Hart" is just not enough.

Camm_hart_500_Wikipedia.jpg
 
Well Haddu, that's an impressive list you got there! To me that's more than enough, but I don't use biplanes that much. Do you miss more than 1 plane (Hawker Hart) ?
 
Lionic said:
I also definitely have a TopGun's Bristol Bulldog in my collection.

EDIT. However it's in the database so it was not worth boasting.
Click to expand...
I have listed not all.

Still have

Bristol Bulldog,
Curtiss P-6E Hawk
4018032363_5bb47836da_z.jpg


Curtiss P-6E Hawk great but a bit big size.
The size of a light bomber, not a fighter.
 
T-mun said:
Well Haddu, that's an impressive list you got there! To me that's more than enough, but I don't use biplanes that much. Do you miss more than 1 plane (Hawker Hart) ?
Click to expand...
The Hawker Hart need.
 
It looks like TopGun/Firefox, the splash pic is totally their style even though it looks old.

Oz, I'm amazed that there's a unit you don't know :lol:


EDIT: resizing is easy, one can do it very quickly.
EDIT 2: attachement deleted.
 
T-mun said:
It looks like TopGun/Firefox, the splash pic is totally their style even though it looks old.

Oz, I'm amazed that there's a unit you don't know :lol:
Click to expand...

I shall plead "It's Locked Away Separately" due to a Long Ago & Best Forgotten Episode and, sadly, I shall now have to do some serious spelunking in The Archives to see if it can even be legally posted here :shake:
 
I have deleted the attachement in my post because I think you're probably right, Oz. Now I also think this plane should not be posted here because it was deleted by its creators. It is sad because the unit looks good but it's a creator's decision to keep a file or delete it.
 
T-mun said:
I have deleted the attachement in my post because I think you're probably right, Oz. Now I also think this plane should not be posted here because it was deleted by its creators. It is sad because the unit looks good but it's a creator's decision to keep a file or delete it.
Click to expand...

*sigh* This is the second time I've had to step into the same minefield ...

T-mun, my friend, anything posted here at CFC by someone who either made it him- or herself is legally "in the public domain." Beyond that, let me try to limit myself by simply stating that posting someone else's work, in part or whole, without said party's permission - and whether or not by accident or ignorance - is where matters become "problematic."

Yours Still Not An Attorney,
:sad:z
 
Haddu said:
And was perhaps an official ban from the author unit?
What not to put?


I can remove it.
Click to expand...
In this case Ozymandias is suspecting that the unit is one of several which was removed because a model was used without properly crediting the creator & getting their permission.

A perfect illustration that creative works available for download through CFC are better described as free for unrestricted non-commercial use rather than "public domain" (a phrase with a very specific legal meaning), since the act of uploading to the database does not abrogate all the author's rights. The FAQ does use the phrase "public domain" in the context of posts rather than creations in the database. Trolls were claiming that moderators were violating the law by editing their posts, and people were also insisting that when they were no longer a member it was the responsibility of staff to remove every single post they had ever written. The phrase "public domain" is used in the FAQ as a reminder that what we write here is public and no longer in the same category as if we published a book or had an individual blog. It was never meant to be - can not be - a binding legal description of the disposition of intellectual property rights with regards to creative work in the database.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Delta_Strife
Air Force's of the World
32 33 34
Replies
671
Views
94K
Delta_Strife
Delta_Strife
Adler17
AoI II Unit Request: Planes
Replies
15
Views
2K
jatibi
J
Back
Top Bottom