City Raizing

[Bill_in_PDX]

This is a poll of the citizenry to set Fanatikan policy.

In accordance with Code of Standards, Section F, I post this Official poll which can be binding, depending on the outcome. If the option of Maybe - Conditionally is chosen, then a follow on discussion and poll must occur to define those conditions.

The relevant discussion for this topic has occured for the appropriate timeframe in this thread: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?s=&postid=546372#post546372

This poll will remain open for a minimum of 48 hours, or until a quorum is reached.

 

[Cyc]

City razing I am definately against. I vote No.

 

[FionnMcCumhall]

it makes us look bad in the eyes of the AI

 

[Eklektikos]

I voted "maybe". I am very much against city razing in the early game, but feel that it can be a useful tool in certain circumstances in later eras.

 

[Kennelly]

No,no,no.

 

[Bill_in_PDX]

This is a close race, more votes needed.

 

[GenMarshall]

As I said be for, and Ill say it again .

Cities are too valuble to raize. No City Raizing

 

[Chieftess]

How about workers down to size 1 and abandoned?

Otherwise, no raizing.

 

[neutral leader]

even the vandals didnt commit any killing or rapine in the sack of rome! there is no we can allow ourselves to stoop to hunnic levels.

 

[Bill_in_PDX]

This poll has reached quorum, and no razing of cities is allowed.

The use of abandonment of cities was approved in another poll.

Bill
Chief Justice