bengalryan9
Emperor
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2018
- Messages
- 1,083
Hey all, I thought before we move on to discussing civs from the exploration age we should put a bow on our conversations by giving a general overview of how we view the antiquity age civs as a whole.
First, here are links to every thread we've had so far:
Aksum
Carthage
Egypt
Greece
Han
Khmer
Maurya
Maya
Mississippian
Persia
Rome
***I will try to go back and add links here as new civs are released and we discuss them as well.***
To close out our discussions, how would you rank the civs of the antiquity age? Share your own personal tier list and let us know your thoughts on the matter. Keep in mind, this only has to be your opinion... you don't need to try to come up with what you think community consensus is. Feel free to rank them by effectiveness, personal preference, how much you actually want to play them, or whatever criteria you feel like.
For those unfamiliar with tier lists, they usually go something like this:
S tier - the best of the best... some times people view S tier as broken/in need of a nerf, but that tends to vary
A tier - very good, strong choice
B tier - above average, but probably have some weaknesses as well
C tier - average, can compete but can also struggle from game to game
D tier - below average, struggle to compete
F tier - the opposite of S tier, typically broken in the opposite direction and they probably are in need of buffs
***Not every tier needs to have civs in it... you may only use 3-4 tiers depending on how you look at things.***
I have to run for now but I'll come back and post my list later today.
First, here are links to every thread we've had so far:
Aksum
Carthage
Egypt
Greece
Han
Khmer
Maurya
Maya
Mississippian
Persia
Rome
***I will try to go back and add links here as new civs are released and we discuss them as well.***
To close out our discussions, how would you rank the civs of the antiquity age? Share your own personal tier list and let us know your thoughts on the matter. Keep in mind, this only has to be your opinion... you don't need to try to come up with what you think community consensus is. Feel free to rank them by effectiveness, personal preference, how much you actually want to play them, or whatever criteria you feel like.
For those unfamiliar with tier lists, they usually go something like this:
S tier - the best of the best... some times people view S tier as broken/in need of a nerf, but that tends to vary
A tier - very good, strong choice
B tier - above average, but probably have some weaknesses as well
C tier - average, can compete but can also struggle from game to game
D tier - below average, struggle to compete
F tier - the opposite of S tier, typically broken in the opposite direction and they probably are in need of buffs
***Not every tier needs to have civs in it... you may only use 3-4 tiers depending on how you look at things.***
I have to run for now but I'll come back and post my list later today.