Well, I normally win by letting time play its toll, and waiting until a fair deal of techs have been discovered. I spend time researching, and then towards the end of the middle ages-pre industrial age i tend to focus on making an army. Simply because i exploit the fact of being about 10 techs ahead of everyone else. (Normally 15 other players unless some r destroyed) When i start fighting, i regularly win battles, theres only the odd few i lose. On warlord, for some reason it feels like i've been moved by about 3 levels for some reason

I'm normally behind on techs by bout 5 less than all the other civs. AI always seems to be able to build faster than me (could just be the terrain though). My cities go into disorder easily because of 'over-crowding' (is there a way to turn crowded complainers off?). The AI's troops r more difficult, but i can handle them.
I'm using similair strategies in Warlord than in Cheiftain. I'm guessing I have to be more offensive? (I'm worlds better at Defence, so thats my main focus.)
I did infact start a game with Warlord on today, and its not going as bad as expected...made it till year 70BC so far i think, and captured 1 (yes, you read it, 1, One, Uno, Un, Ein) city belonging to Russia, before both our armies came to a stalemate. Mine are primarily made up of Swordsmen, being the best i can build. I'm on a Peninsula, and not much land mass available, Russia see's me as 'technologically backwards', and finances have suddenly started falling. (Probebly due to the Russian War)
Is there anymore advice, or could this thread be moved elsewhere?