Domination on New Game

Phoenix

Creating Scenarios
Joined
Nov 6, 2001
Messages
1,001
Location
Stoke-on-Trent, England
This thread is for those people who want to see a domination victory on the new world. To make this victoory possible the world should be standard size at the biggest. :)

If you would like to see our tanks roll over our enemies in the new game, or see our culture assimilate their territory to us so that we cover 50% of the globe, sign up to this thread and vote for it in the polls. ;)
 
Looks like we'll be on a huge world, on emperor level. Although it makes domination very difficult, it just about forces us to assume a domination mentality in order to achieve any victory condition. I support a dominant outlook for the new game.
 
Sounds like the next game might take a bit longer... I'd be up for a bit more militaristic action.
 
Yes but this is a problem that we must resolve, we cannot simply say that we will not have a war cause it will clog up the turn chat. I say we should change the way that our government works: we could give the leaders more power and have the citizens as advisors. But it wouldn't become a Despotic rule because we can always vote the leaders out in the elections.

Note: I am aware that a few months back I was calling for a vote on everything in the Power to the People organisation.
 
It's time we attempted a domination victory. It would appear we're going to be Deutscheland (fights hard to not sing national anthem), and between the militaristic ability, the ability to get Swordsmen before everyone else (we start with Bronze Working and can quickly get Iron Working), and our Panzers we should easilly be able to expand our territory through battle.
 
We're going to need a very skilled president, especially for the first several terms. We will also need to campaign heavily for an agressive stance. Many of our citizens have never played (or at least played successfully) on emperor level and will not understand how critical an early agressive posture is. I think we need to form a citizens' group. Any name suggestions?
 
How about the "Strategic Advisory Committee"?
 
next he'll be suggesting the "Wehrmacht"... :p
 
We should implement a english language type thing with äöüß ;-)

Strätegic Ädvisöry Böärd


EDIT:
after reading it, this looked more like scandinavian language ... :-(
 
Back
Top Bottom