Earliest Known Hebrew Text In Proto-Canaanite Script Discovered

Knight-Dragon

Unhidden Dragon
Retired Moderator
Joined
Jun 25, 2001
Messages
19,961
Location
Singapore
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/11/081103091035.htm

Earliest Known Hebrew Text In Proto-Canaanite Script Discovered In Area Where 'David Slew Goliath'

ScienceDaily (Nov. 3, 2008) — The earliest known Hebrew text written in a Proto-Canaanite script has been discovered by Hebrew University archaeologists in an ancient city in the area where legend has it that David slew Goliath – the earliest Judean city found to date. The 3,000 year old finding is thought to be the most significant archaeological discovery in Israel since the Dead Sea Scrolls – predating them by 1,000 years.

The ostracon (pottery shard inscribed with writing in ink) comprises five lines of text divided by black lines and measures 15 x 15 cm. and was found at excavations of a 10th century B.C.E. fortress - the oldest known Judaic city.

The ostracon was found lying on the floor inside a building near the city gate of the site, known as the Elah Fortress at Khirbet Qeiyafa.

Excavations are being led by Prof. Yosef Garfinkel, the Yigal Yadin Professor of Archaeology at the Institute of Archaeology at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and his partner Saar Ganur, in partnership with Foundation Stone, a non-profit educational organization which works to provide a contemporary voice to ancient stories. The excavations and analysis are also being supported by J.B. Silver and the Brennan Foundation.

Why is this inscription so special?

Carbon-14 dating of organic material found with the ostracon, administered by Oxford University, along with pottery analysis dates this inscription to the time of King David ca. 3,000 years ago – predating the Dead Sea Scrolls by approximately a millennium, and placing it earlier than the famed Gezer Calendar.

It is hoped the text inscribed on the 'Qeiyafa Ostracon' will serve as an anchor in our understanding of the development of all alphabetic scripts.

While the inscription has yet to be deciphered, initial interpretation indicates the text was part of a letter and contains the roots of the words "judge", "slave" and "king". This may indicate that this is a legal text that could provide insights into Hebrew law, society and beliefs. Archaeologists say that it was clearly written as a deliberate message by a trained scribe.

What is the Elah Fortress?

Dating to the 10th century B.C.E., the Elah Fortress is the earliest known fortified city of the biblical period in Israel. Excavations began on the site in June 2008.

Comprising 23 dunams [2.3 hectares], the Elah Fortress (Khirbet Qeiyafa) was situated on the border between Philistia and the Kingdom of Judea (5 kilometers south of current day Bet Shemesh.). It is thought to have been a major strategic checkpoint guarding the main road from Philistia and the Coastal Plain to Jerusalem, which was just a day's walk away.

Nearly 600 square meters of the Elah Fortress have so far been unearthed. Surrounded by a 700 meter-long massive city wall, the fortress was built with megalithic stones - some weighing four to five tons. The city wall is four meters wide, constructed with casemates. Archaeologists estimate that 200,000 tons of rock were hewn, moved and used in the construction of these fortifications.

A four-chambered gate, 10.5 meters across, is the dominant feature of the massive fortifications. Further excavations will reveal whether it is really six chambers and whether there are other gates. The larger rocks in the gate structure weigh five to eight tons.

To date, only four percent of the site has been excavated, promising many more incredible discoveries in the remaining 96 percent in the future.

How do we know this is a Judean fortress?

The early Hebrew ostracon, Judean pottery similar to that found at other Israelite settlements, and the absence of pig bones among the animal bones found at the site all point to this fortress being a city of the Kingdom of Judea.

Elah Fortress proof of United Monarchy

The Elah Fortress archaeological site could prove the existence of the United Monarchy, which scholars often question ever existed. The artifacts found at the site thus far all indicate that there was most likely a strong king and central government in Jerusalem - earlier than any discovered until now - rather than a number of small villages scattered throughout Judea. This would verify descriptions and narratives found in Samuel and Chronicles.

Over 100 jar handles bear distinct impressions which may indicate a link to royal vessels. Such a large quantity of this feature found in one small locale is unprecedented.

David & Goliath

The site of Khirbet Qeiyafa is situated among four biblical cities in Judea's inheritance chronicled in the Book of Joshua 35:15 - Azeka, Socho, Yarmut and Adulam. The biblical narrative located the battle between David and Goliath between Socho and Azeka. According to legend, David selected five stones from the nearby Elah Creek with which to slay Goliath.

According to Prof. Garfinkel, this is the only site in Israel where one can investigate the historical King David. "The chronology and geography of Khirbet Qeiyafa create a unique meeting point between the mythology, history, historiography and archaeology of Kind David."

Adapted from materials provided by Hebrew University of Jerusalem, via AlphaGalileo.
081103091035.jpg

The ostracon with the oldest known Hebrew inscription. (Credit: Photo by Gabi Laron)
 
While the inscription has yet to be deciphered, initial interpretation indicates the text was part of a letter and contains the roots of the words "judge", "slave" and "king" . . .

How do we know this is a Judean fortress?

The early Hebrew ostracon, Judean pottery similar to that found at other Israelite settlements, and the absence of pig bones among the animal bones found at the site all point to this fortress being a city of the Kingdom of Judea.

I think they're being a little hasty classifying it as Hebrew, if it hasn't been deciphered and it's in a script that isn't unique to Hebrews. There's a bit of circular argument going on here too ... the ostracon is supposed to be Hebrew because the site is Hebrew, and the site is supposed to be Hebrew because the ostracon is Hebrew.

Canaanite pottery and Hebrew pottery from this period is indistinguishable. The pig bones might be something, but there's no guarantee pig bones would be found there even if it wasn't Judean. Pigs were not a popular animal among any of the peoples of the Levant, because there are no forests to graze them in, so they have to be fed crops.

The fact that it's sitting on a border makes it further uncertain about who it belonged to.

Archaeology in Israel is always subject to a powerful religious/political agenda, so I'm a bit dubious about this being Judean, although it is certainly an interesting find even if it isn't.
 
Does anyone else find it disturbing that the photo shows some dude touching the "oldest known Hebrew inscription" with his bare hands? It's a real dumb$h1t thing to do & an archaeologist should know better.

Now I'm gonna have to wait to find out what the inscription says.:sad: I knew what the Gezer Calendar said. I hope they publish the translation quickly.

I'm a little confused that it says that this inscription is older than the Gezer Calendar while saying it dates to 1,000 to 900 BCE. The Gezer Calendar dates to 1,200 BCE... They need to clear up their assertion.

I think they're being a little hasty classifying it as Hebrew, if it hasn't been deciphered and it's in a script that isn't unique to Hebrews.

Written Hebrew borrowed the Phoenician alphabet. Early written Hebrew is almost exactly the same as the Phoenician alphabet & it became more unique over time. Almost every culture in the area borrowed the Phoenician alphabet when it became literate during that period.

There's a bit of circular argument going on here too ... the ostracon is supposed to be Hebrew because the site is Hebrew, and the site is supposed to be Hebrew because the ostracon is Hebrew.

Experts in that field can distinguish between the scripts of the various languages. The article should have been more clear on that. It's translation will show definitively whether it's Phoenician or Hebrew. The article calls written Phoenician, "proto Canaanite," but it's the same thing.

Canaanite pottery and Hebrew pottery from this period is indistinguishable. The pig bones might be something, but there's no guarantee pig bones would be found there even if it wasn't Judean. Pigs were not a popular animal among any of the peoples of the Levant, because there are no forests to graze them in, so they have to be fed crops.

The pottery might be the same, but you have too look at a broader picture. It can be seen pretty clearly when Canaanite sites were invaded by Hebrews. Canaanite, Aramean & Egyptian temples are replaced by Hebrew ones, pig bones disappear, Phoenician writing is replaced with early Hebrew, evidence of human sacrifice ends, sometimes there is a destruction layer, etc. There is one case where a Hebrew & a Canaanite/Aramean temple coexisted, but that is rare.

The archaeological record very clearly shows Phoenician/Canaanite culture being supplanted by Hebrew & Philistine cultures during that period. It's not even a matter of debate so far as I'm aware.

The fact that it's sitting on a border makes it further uncertain about who it belonged to.

Your missing that it sits on the border of Judea & Philistia. The Philistines used a writing system based on Linear B from Greece & their pottery originated on Cyprus. Their culture was clearly different than that of the Canaanites, Egyptians or Hebrews. It's very easy to see the difference between a Philistine & a Hebrew site.

Archaeology in Israel is always subject to a powerful religious/political agenda, so I'm a bit dubious about this being Judean, although it is certainly an interesting find even if it isn't.

Seeing as how the Philistines vanished about 2,700 years ago, I doubt the Israelis are worried about any of them laying claim to the area again.

Count it as my service to the forum. :p

Given that I am too lazy to argue nowadays...

Awww. Please argue. I love to read good arguments on this site.:)
 
There is one case where a Hebrew & a Canaanite/Aramean temple coexisted, but that is rare.

Hardly ... they are very common. Even the Bible acknowledges the coexistance of Canaanite temples and practices among the Hebrews.

Your missing that it sits on the border of Judea & Philistia. The Philistines used a writing system based on Linear B from Greece & their pottery originated on Cyprus.

You've been misinformed. There are no Phillistine texts in Linear B. All Phillistine texts are in Phoenician/Canaanite - not just the alphabet, but the language too. It is supposed by some that they had some other language previous to this, but nobody really knows.

Seeing as how the Philistines vanished about 2,700 years ago, I doubt the Israelis are worried about any of them laying claim to the area again.

No, they're not trying to establish (or disestablish) anything about the Philistines, it's establishing a historical basis to fortify their own claims with. Archaeology in Israel is extraordinarily difficult - Silberman's written an entire book on the problem that is highly instructive (Digging for God and Country). This particular discovery is one of the most politically distorted of all, because they hope to use it to prove the existance of the United Monarchy, which has been widely discredited.
 
Back
Top Bottom