Unlike you, i seem to be able to spell "you're", that is, the contracted form of "you are", without mistaking it for "your", the adjective.You should be clearer at what your saying, I understand what your "trying" to say but it's completely illiterate.
As for being illiterate and not being clear about what i'm saying...
You're basically saying that it makes no sense that Guerilla III gives withdrawal in all circumstances. Fine. Do you then think that it doesn't make any sense either for Woodsman to give First Strikes and Healing, regardless of the presence of Forests? Would you then say, as you did with Guerilla, that "it was prob a oversight, thats extremely unrealistic, even from a game standpoint." (which i assumed meant "it was probably an oversight, that's extremely unrealistic, even from a gameplay standpoint", but i might be wrong, seeing as how i'm illiterate compared to you) ? If that is the case, what do you think is more likely: that the game has a high number of oversights like this, or that you are, in fact, wrong?
"you still having" is not proper English, as it lacks the auxiliary verb used in the forming of the progressive form.You still having problems with your vassal situationmy last game I had 6... It was so much fun, no colonies either..
Now that we've had fun, can i kindly ask you to refrain from posting any remark on the way someone writes, especially considering:
- the person you're talking to is possibly not a native English-speaker;
- you can't spell.
Thank you very much.
Moderator Action: Warned - Don't try and fix someone else's grammar.
Please read the forum rules: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=422889
