RainyCloud
Chieftain
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2002
- Messages
- 7
I've read lots posts here and see most people believe a golden age triggered at around medieval era is the best. At first, I thought so too, but now I have a second option - we should not measure the GA bonus in absolute quantities. Of course, when you have 20 cities, a GA would provide much more income/production bonus than when you have 5 cities, but how is that bonus related to your TOTAL production output? I say we should measure it in one standard: the turns your GA saved you.
Civ3 is a turn based game, thus most actions take multiple turns to complete. In the early age, your production is so low that the turns seem fly so fast that you can hardly notice you spent 10 turns to build a settler. If you could somehow trigger your golden age at this time, you could easily get 30-50% bonus to your TOTAL food/production/commerce output. Those bonus are HUGE if you can realize it. For the 20 turns within GA, it could at least save you 5-10 turns to complete a few settlers, or build a granary to grow. This will result in every new city get founded a few turns earlier, and the cities they later found a few turns earlier. See the snowball effect? Later on when you have 20 cities on hand, this is no longer the situation, as 1 more food/production/commerce per square can only be described as "Nice bonus" instead of "Critical".
One more thing to note is that at the beginning, your surrounding terrains are less likely to be fully developed by worker, and the GA bonus will be relatively much higher than when you cities are working on fully developed zones. If your undeveloped land give you 1 shield and 1 commerce, add GA you get a 100% increase in both shield and commerce; if that land has road and a mine, GA only give a 50% increase for both.
So, should we consider an earlier GA?
Civ3 is a turn based game, thus most actions take multiple turns to complete. In the early age, your production is so low that the turns seem fly so fast that you can hardly notice you spent 10 turns to build a settler. If you could somehow trigger your golden age at this time, you could easily get 30-50% bonus to your TOTAL food/production/commerce output. Those bonus are HUGE if you can realize it. For the 20 turns within GA, it could at least save you 5-10 turns to complete a few settlers, or build a granary to grow. This will result in every new city get founded a few turns earlier, and the cities they later found a few turns earlier. See the snowball effect? Later on when you have 20 cities on hand, this is no longer the situation, as 1 more food/production/commerce per square can only be described as "Nice bonus" instead of "Critical".
One more thing to note is that at the beginning, your surrounding terrains are less likely to be fully developed by worker, and the GA bonus will be relatively much higher than when you cities are working on fully developed zones. If your undeveloped land give you 1 shield and 1 commerce, add GA you get a 100% increase in both shield and commerce; if that land has road and a mine, GA only give a 50% increase for both.
So, should we consider an earlier GA?