jprc
My dog is smarter than me
Grey Fox's manual is included in the patches and the related thread is sticky whilst Xienwolf's work and thread is not.
Grey Fox: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=257728
Xienwolf: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=265888
In my humble opinion, Xienwolf's manual, in its current version (1.8) is now at least equivalent to Grey Fox's version, is easier to browse (thanks to the tons of hyperlinks) and print (white background), and is updated with latest changes. It corresponds also better to an off-line version of a revised pedia, which is nice.
It is not a competition for knowing who is the best.
Both made a huge lengthy work deserving many praises and thanks!!
We don't want to waste 2 talents by making 2 manuals aiming, I think, at the same goal.
The problem will be to know which manual will grow in the future and will stick better to the constant evolution of FFH2...
Question:
Which choice will be best for you (FFH)?:
1- Include both manuals in the coming patches? (Makes it bigger but user can choose)
2- Stick for a while with Grey Fox's manual (at least until it is obsolete)
3- Have only Xienwolf’s manual included in the future patches.
4- Have whatever manual: just put the most recent / better updated in the next patch!
5- Have the FFH writers merging the 2 works?
6- Remove both manuals from the patches and add an entry in the pedia with the links?
7- Include Xienwolf and/or Grey Fox in the FFH team , making them officially in charge of the manual.
8- Another idea (please elaborate in a post)
9- Don’t care about any manual!
... My own choices would be 3 (it is currently better updated), then 4 and 7.
(Multiple choice possible)
Grey Fox: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=257728
Xienwolf: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=265888
In my humble opinion, Xienwolf's manual, in its current version (1.8) is now at least equivalent to Grey Fox's version, is easier to browse (thanks to the tons of hyperlinks) and print (white background), and is updated with latest changes. It corresponds also better to an off-line version of a revised pedia, which is nice.
It is not a competition for knowing who is the best.
Both made a huge lengthy work deserving many praises and thanks!!
We don't want to waste 2 talents by making 2 manuals aiming, I think, at the same goal.
The problem will be to know which manual will grow in the future and will stick better to the constant evolution of FFH2...
Question:
Which choice will be best for you (FFH)?:
1- Include both manuals in the coming patches? (Makes it bigger but user can choose)
2- Stick for a while with Grey Fox's manual (at least until it is obsolete)
3- Have only Xienwolf’s manual included in the future patches.
4- Have whatever manual: just put the most recent / better updated in the next patch!
5- Have the FFH writers merging the 2 works?
6- Remove both manuals from the patches and add an entry in the pedia with the links?
7- Include Xienwolf and/or Grey Fox in the FFH team , making them officially in charge of the manual.
8- Another idea (please elaborate in a post)
9- Don’t care about any manual!
... My own choices would be 3 (it is currently better updated), then 4 and 7.
(Multiple choice possible)