Future Tech's?

[Ukraineboy]

What do you think, should we have plausible future techs? like Cloning, Robotics etc.

What is your opinion?

 

[Vancouver 2010]

We should have some future techs. Not sci-fi/fantasy techs that would degredate from the game, but some that we are close to achieving -- or at least aren't very far off (Cloning, Fusion, etc).

And there's already a Robotics tech in the game.

 

[PenguinKing]

Heck yeah! It's always seemed stupid to me researching a 'future tech'. Okay, great! FUTURISTIC! What does it DOOO??

 

[General Zarof]

Like any of the other techs. Gets you acess to more units/gov tpes or city improvements.

 

[globester]

Originally posted by Vancouver2010
We should have some future techs. Not sci-fi/fantasy techs that would degredate from the game, but some that we are close to achieving -- or at least aren't very far off (Cloning, Fusion, etc).

And there's already a Robotics tech in the game.

well, as long as it doesn't get sci-fi indeed
no cyborgs etc.
i still remember ctp

 

[Gainy]

I'm completely and utterly against it. Civilisation is a Historical game, not a Sci-fi one. It would cheapen the game...

 

[The_Patrician]

Ughh, Call To Power was one big over the top futuristic mistake! Keep It simple and beleivable!

 

[Ukraineboy]

Well, when I mean futuristic, I mean *plausible* futurestic (for those who dont know, plausible means possible) like.. lets say Cloning, or "Advanced Infantry" or something like that...

I dont want no Cyborgs and space ships.. plausible ones