Ah. Sounds good. I have an IDE cable already so thats good.Jeratain said:You'll be fine with a standard OEM drive. The only difference between retail and OEM hard drives is that the retail includes some useless CD and an extra IDE cable with a booklet. All you need is the hard drive and an IDE cable. Your motherboard should already have an IDE cable avaiable.
Jeratain said:The hard drives you linked to are no good. They have long seek times and only include a 2MB buffer. Not only that, but they are only 40GB, which, as Crazy Eddie points out, is not good value.
Hmm, thats not actually not all that bad of an idea. Thanks.Jeratain said:I'd recommend getting something like this, which includes an 8MB buffer and 8.9ms seek time - not to mention that it's 80GB for only a few bucks more.
I have IDE so...Jeratain said:Depending on your motherboard, you also have the option between SATA and IDE hard drives. The main difference here is the type of cable that connects the hard drive to the motherboard. There isn't a significant enough speed difference (yet) to really make a difference in buying either. To be on the safe side, stick with the IDE drives for the time being.
Crazy Eddie said:Well, the new one will be completely blank so it will need a full reinstall of any drivers when you install windows. There's no need to touch any of the hardware, and the BIOS should autodetect the new drive.
It's not too much trouble with a little preparation and you get a nice clean copy of windows again, which is always a good thing.
BIOS = Basic Input Output SystemDamnyankee said:by hardware you mean..... and what is BIOS, never got that(hey i'm a computer noob what do you expect)
Crazy Eddie said:Also bear in mind that if you slave your old HD or optical drive to the new one it'll slow it down. Try to keep it seperate if you can, it'll improve it's speed. (you may have to temporarily connect the two if you need to transfer data)
Woah, not a good idea! Two drives on the same IDE channel need to use the same transfer mode, which means they'll both run at the speed of the slowest drive. If you slave an optical drive (ata/33) to a hard disk (typicaly ata/100-133) you can seriously reduce data transfer rates.Strontium_Dog said:You can avoid bottlenecking by re-arranging your IDE devices, when adding a second HDD. The existing HDD should (or the new one, if you want to boot from it) should be on the Primary channel, as master. Connect your cd-rom to the primary slave. Put the second HDD on the Secondary Master, and any DVD-rom as the secondary slave. Unfortunatly, the standard ribbon cables probably won't reach, to do this...
3 dollars is about what you'll be able to sell it for.MarineCorps said:I have every intention to sell the POS. $$$![]()
I have two of those - have been very stable - zero problems at all.Jeratain said:I'd recommend getting something like this, which includes an 8MB buffer and 8.9ms seek time - not to mention that it's 80GB for only a few bucks more.
Jeratain said:Depending on your motherboard, you also have the option between SATA and IDE hard drives. The main difference here is the type of cable that connects the hard drive to the motherboard. There isn't a significant enough speed difference (yet) to really make a difference in buying either. To be on the safe side, stick with the IDE drives for the time being.
Crazy Eddie said:Woah, not a good idea! Two drives on the same IDE channel need to use the same transfer mode, which means they'll both run at the speed of the slowest drive. If you slave an optical drive (ata/33) to a hard disk (typicaly ata/100-133) you can seriously reduce data transfer rates.