Gerard
Prince
I'm a peacefull man, but in Civ II (I'm new in Civ III), I've found that the war is a better method to obtain points. I suppose the same for Civ III. What you think about?
Originally posted by RX2000
...I could care less if Person X has played a game and scored a bajillion points, good for him. That doesnt mean that I want to play the game for points. I play to have fun, simple as that...
Originally posted by DaDoo
I tried so hard to play peacefully in civ3 but to no avail. I was able to do it in both the original civ and civ2. So now I've resorted to the warmongering way *sigh*
Originally posted by Panda
Peace is the period between two wars![]()
Originally posted by DaDoo
I tried so hard to play peacefully in civ3 but to no avail. I was able to do it in both the original civ and civ2. So now I've resorted to the warmongering way *sigh*
Originally posted by RX2000
I just dont play like that. I respect others boundaries, and I usually try for the Diplomatic or Space Race victory. ... I try to play the game somewhat like an RPG, and I almost always try to be a nice leader. ... like to be able to thrash a Civ if I have to, but I dont really go looking for it.