'Most Recent Common Ancestor' Of All Living Humans Surprisingly Recent

Knight-Dragon

Unhidden Dragon
Retired Moderator
Joined
Jun 25, 2001
Messages
19,961
Location
Singapore
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2004/09/040930122428.htm

New Haven, Conn. -- In this week's issue of Nature, a Yale mathematician presents models showing that the most recent person who was a direct ancestor of all humans currently alive may have lived just a few thousand years ago.

"While we may not all be 'brothers,' the models suggest we are all hundredth cousins or so," said Joseph T. Chang, professor in the Department of Statistics at Yale University and senior author on the paper.

Chang established the basis of this research in a previous publication with an intentionally simplified model that ignored such complexities as geography and migration. Those precise mathematical results showed that in a world obeying the simplified assumptions, the most recent common ancestor would have lived less than 1,000 years ago. He also introduced the "identical ancestors point," the most recent time -- less than 2,000 years ago in the simplified model -- when each person was an ancestor to all or ancestor to none of the people alive today.

The current paper presents more realistic mathematical and computer models. It incorporates factors such as socially driven mating, physical barriers of geography and migration, and recorded historical events. Although such complexities make pure mathematical analysis difficult, it was possible to integrate them into an elaborate computer simulation model. The computer repeatedly simulated history under varying assumptions, tracking the lives, movements, and reproduction of all people who lived within the last 20,000 years.

These more realistic models estimate that the most recent common ancestor of mankind lived as recently as about 3,000 years ago, and the identical ancestors point was as recent as several thousand years ago. The paper suggests, "No matter the languages we speak or the color of our skin, we share ancestors who planted rice on the banks of the Yangtze, who first domesticated horses on the steppes of the Ukraine, who hunted giant sloths in the forests of North and South America, and who labored to build the Great Pyramid of Khufu."

The results can also work backwards, into the future. According to Chang, "Within two thousand years, it is likely that everyone on earth will be descended from most of us."

###

Other authors are Douglas L.T. Rhode of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Steve Olson of Bethesda, MD. The National Institutes of Health supported this research.

Citation: Nature 431: (September 30, 2004). For solicited commentary on this paper, see News & Views and supplementary material in the same issue.

Editor's Note: The original news release can be found here.
 
I'm not surprised about that story. We can decently say that people living in Europe, Asia and most of Africa are all descendants of everyone who lived at the time of Jesus Christ and let a decendancy. The only exceptions come from Polynesians, Aborigenese and Native Americans. What's funny about this is that if Jesus Christ actually had kids, then it means 98% of human beings are descendants from Jesus Christ. ;)
 
They are not saying we are all descended from everyone (i.e.) Poles have Khosian blood, but that a few key descendants have passed their genes to most people in the world (i.e Ramses, Julius Caesar, Ghengis Khan, etc.) It is basically a one way street with the conquerors being the ones to pass on the genes. As have been stated very little Sub-Saharan, Amerindian, or Australian Aboriginal blood has been passed because these groups have not yet been major players on the political world stage. But a would definately not be surprised if Asia, Europe, and North Africa are linked more closely than previously thought.
 
Back
Top Bottom