I am experienced with Civ V but new to Civ VI. This is why I struggle with it. I started a new game as the infamous (in real life and Civ VI) Harald Hardrada of Norway.
Anyway, it's in the 2000s BC and my world had started. I encountered Spain and decided to only be civil with them for around 20 turns before going to war. Early war gives no warmonger penalty, so that's what I am aiming for. Anyway, I go to war with them and my troops are attacking Spain's second city, Cordoba. I sent my archer, warrior, viking warship, and scout. I weakened the city at the only cost of losing a fraction of some of my troops health.
Then the turn was almost over and the city was weak. Should I strike now with my scout, or wait a turn to do with my warrior? I chose the scout. It was a good decision. I then saw something beautiful: My scout charged in and defeated three men with swords and shields in an epic cinematic fight scene. Cordoba was ours!
Anyway, it's in the 2000s BC and my world had started. I encountered Spain and decided to only be civil with them for around 20 turns before going to war. Early war gives no warmonger penalty, so that's what I am aiming for. Anyway, I go to war with them and my troops are attacking Spain's second city, Cordoba. I sent my archer, warrior, viking warship, and scout. I weakened the city at the only cost of losing a fraction of some of my troops health.
Then the turn was almost over and the city was weak. Should I strike now with my scout, or wait a turn to do with my warrior? I chose the scout. It was a good decision. I then saw something beautiful: My scout charged in and defeated three men with swords and shields in an epic cinematic fight scene. Cordoba was ours!