KabeDerlin
Prince
I'm not quite sure about the rest of you guys, but growing up I played both Civ and Master of Orion and I loved both. When Civ III came out I was very impressed with it so of course when MOO3 came out I rushed to the store and bought it. IT SUCKED! They had successfully taken one of the greatest space strategy games and turned it into crap. There were so many details and useless garbage that the gameplay was all gone. There was so much reading in that game that it was more like playing a book. A boring book...
The beauty of Civ III was that it was easy to learn. After about one or two games, which were quite enjoyable even though you might have been losing, you got the hang of it. That's what won it game of the year. It had so many different aspects but it was still quite simple.
So I ask everyone please, when you are giving suggestions for Civ IV, just remember, the more you complicate the game the less user friendly it will be and the less fun it will be. I like a lot of the ideas I'm seeing but a lot I just think will turn the game into something boring that people wanna fall asleep during.
My suggestion: Don't make another Master of Orion 3. And don't buy Master of Orion 3....
But I'm no expert...
The beauty of Civ III was that it was easy to learn. After about one or two games, which were quite enjoyable even though you might have been losing, you got the hang of it. That's what won it game of the year. It had so many different aspects but it was still quite simple.
So I ask everyone please, when you are giving suggestions for Civ IV, just remember, the more you complicate the game the less user friendly it will be and the less fun it will be. I like a lot of the ideas I'm seeing but a lot I just think will turn the game into something boring that people wanna fall asleep during.
My suggestion: Don't make another Master of Orion 3. And don't buy Master of Orion 3....
But I'm no expert...