Viregel
, The Rt. Hon.
OK, so I was thinking that revolutions could be a lot more fun if they were used properly. The idea here is mainly ideology-based, and you'd have a new type of Great Person, the Great Revolutionary, the names being something like this:
I haven't quite worked out how they would be generated, but they could then be sent to another civilization to help start a revolution! I was also thinking that revolutionaries of all ideologies could be created by any civ, so you can have the situation where Germany sends Lenin into Russia. The plan is that they go into the territory of another civ, and you can Trigger a Revolution. This causes more ideological dissatisfaction, and when it reaches a certain point, Guerrilla Groups appear to try to take cities. They will have been significantly weakened by the revolution, making sure that there's a good chance of taking the city. So, once the city has fallen, who's in charge? The Revolutionary himself, of course.
One turn, a Fascist Boudicca is on the screen, wanting to destroy you, and the next a Communist Lenin is on it, not wanting to destroy you... yet. To me at least, this sounds fairly awesome.
The revolution can possibly take all the cities in the empire, and the capture of a capital could possibly mean an instant win for the revolution. So, what do people think? Good/Bad way to have revolts? It allows for more leaderscreens as well, so, you know...
Spoiler :
Order:
Vladimir Lenin
Ho Chi Minh
Che Guevara
Freedom:
Paul Revere (Avoiding George Washington)
José de San Martin
Simón Bolívar
Autocracy:
Benito Mussolini (Not that controversial, I hope?)
Francisco Franco
António Salazar
Vladimir Lenin
Ho Chi Minh
Che Guevara
Freedom:
Paul Revere (Avoiding George Washington)
José de San Martin
Simón Bolívar
Autocracy:
Benito Mussolini (Not that controversial, I hope?)
Francisco Franco
António Salazar
I haven't quite worked out how they would be generated, but they could then be sent to another civilization to help start a revolution! I was also thinking that revolutionaries of all ideologies could be created by any civ, so you can have the situation where Germany sends Lenin into Russia. The plan is that they go into the territory of another civ, and you can Trigger a Revolution. This causes more ideological dissatisfaction, and when it reaches a certain point, Guerrilla Groups appear to try to take cities. They will have been significantly weakened by the revolution, making sure that there's a good chance of taking the city. So, once the city has fallen, who's in charge? The Revolutionary himself, of course.
One turn, a Fascist Boudicca is on the screen, wanting to destroy you, and the next a Communist Lenin is on it, not wanting to destroy you... yet. To me at least, this sounds fairly awesome.
The revolution can possibly take all the cities in the empire, and the capture of a capital could possibly mean an instant win for the revolution. So, what do people think? Good/Bad way to have revolts? It allows for more leaderscreens as well, so, you know...