Rules?

[TheDuckOfFlanders]

i'm not poling this ,you'll have to vote with reply's.For every question ,vote 1 for yes ,2 for no

1)Do you want standard rules or not?

and if you want cuztomized rules (dont have to choose if you chose 1 on the first question)

2)simplified combat? (i expect no)
3)flat forld? (again no)
4)select computer opponent's?
5)accelerated startup?
6)bloodlust? (like that)
7) don't restart eliminated players (deffinitly yes for me,dead is dead)

 

[knowltok]

1 yes. Standard rules are fine.

I just realized that Chinese and Americans are the same color. I'm going to get pounced on in another thread if I can't get to it to edit it fast enough

 

[.:KNAS:.]

7: like u said dead is dead

 

[Sixchan]

1) no
2) no
3) no
4) yes (Zulus must be in there)
5) no (obviously not)
6) no (I usually win by spaceship when I play)
7) yes (I once had this off. AHRGH!)

 

[Juize]

Yes for 6, 4 and 7.

 

[TheDuckOfFlanders]

Bump

more vote's needed on this ,poll has only one day to live.

 

[Apollo]

1) No
2) No
3) No
4) Yes
5) No
6) No
7) No

 

[CornMaster]

1) Yes
2) No
3) No
4) No
5) No
6) No
7) Yes

 

[.:KNAS:.]

CornMaster, why do you want simplified combat?

 

[CornMaster]

Originally posted by .:KNAS:.
CornMaster, why do you want simplified combat?

Simplified combat is number 2 in which I said No. Because I don't want it.

 

[spycatcher34]

1No
2no
3no
4yes
5no
6no
7yes

 

[TheDuckOfFlanders]

This is close to be wraped up.
Everybody agree's on option 7.
option 2-3-5 nobody seem to like those.

Option 4 will probably be included.I think nobody has a problem with that. even the guy's that didn't care about those option's ,i don't think they have a problem with it.If you dou ,tell me.

for now ,let's just vote if we include option 6 or not.

 

[jumbo2002]

1) Yes
2) No
3) No
4) No
5) No
6) No
7) Yes

 

[animepornstar]

bloodlust yes

 

[jomey]

Bloodlust.........:ripper: :rocket2: :rocket: :rocket3: [plasma] :tank:

 

[Sixchan]

NO! NO!

We can win by space if we get ahead in techs but aren't large enough to support a offensive military!

 

[.:KNAS:.]

Originally posted by Sixchan
NO! NO!

We can win by space if we get ahead in techs but aren't large enough to support a offensive military!

if we get ahead in techs we cab also build bigger badder guns......

but i would like to have the bloodlust feature turned off

 

[CornMaster]

Ok...Results are in. (So the voting ends)

Raw Data:
1) No 1111
2) No 111111
3) No 111111
4) No 11
5) No 111111
6) No 11111
7) No 1

1) Yes 111
2) Yes
3) Yes
4) Yes 1111
5) Yes
6) Yes 111
7) Yes 111111

Which means:

1) No
2) No
3) No
4) Yes
5) No
6) No
7) Yes

 

[jomey]

NO! NO!

We can win by space if we get ahead in techs but aren't large enough to support a offensive military!

I know, but where the satisfaction in that .

I just don't want us ending up with the last 500 years building a spacecraft when there is only one AI civ, city size 2 and a phalanx to defend itself. The idea is not to maximise points but to have communal enjoyment and decision making by a group.

Only time will tell......... :ripper: :rocket2: :rocket3: :rocket:

 

[jomey]

Oh darn the decisions been made