rsab
Warlord
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2014
- Messages
- 189
In my games I hardly ever (or never) spend time to build up scouts. I always consider warriors much better option since they're stronger, can face barbarians, and they can feed my cities when killing animals in a close city radius.
Somebody thinks differently? I would like to see if there are good reasons for going for Scouts. Or maybe the warrior-scout decision should be balanced doing some changes.
Also, I'm used to play in the hardest difficult levels. There the AI always starts with warrior + scout? Because AI always has one or a couple of scouts.
Somebody thinks differently? I would like to see if there are good reasons for going for Scouts. Or maybe the warrior-scout decision should be balanced doing some changes.
Also, I'm used to play in the hardest difficult levels. There the AI always starts with warrior + scout? Because AI always has one or a couple of scouts.