sebsage Find The Monopoly Scenario (PTW & Reg.)

1 - 10, Rate my scenario!

  • 10

    Votes: 4 18.2%
  • 9

    Votes: 1 4.5%
  • 8

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 7

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 6

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 5

    Votes: 1 4.5%
  • 4

    Votes: 1 4.5%
  • 3

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 2

    Votes: 2 9.1%
  • 1

    Votes: 13 59.1%

  • Total voters
    22

Syrus_Knife

Sifted Silaphi
Joined
Nov 6, 2002
Messages
536
Location
In my state of mind.
:)kay, I finished my 'Find the Monopoly' scenario. (This should boost my rep ;) )

There are 16 Civs (PTW & Reg Compatible), a hidden land defended by brutal barbarians. Find the land and inside monopolize the resources. Somehow, you will be building a city there struggling with other Civs about territory and trading.

Have Fun.....
 

Attachments

By the time you explore that entire area, you'll have the game won. Why? Because, the AI -does not build in the tundra-. Especially if they're landlocked, as some of those civs are. Besides, there's no sea, so you're out of luck until navigation. Do you REALLY want to wait that long?

I'll give you a 2, but only because I feel sorry for you. :p
 
Sebsage,

You have got to be the busiest person in the forums. Countless projects and units.

Most people have a problem with AI sprawl. Is Sebsages' map not allowing the AI to build at all?!

Curse his luck, one hard break after another. :crazyeye:
 
Dude, this scenario sucked!!!! What a stupid waste of server space!!!! Definitely a -1!
 
:lol:


Better than most of his stuff, so indeed it has probably boosted your reputation!

;)
 
I was hoping, when you actually found the monopoly, were your units basically even with the barbarians or lower or higher? I made them Late Middle Age Barbarian Units because it would be a challenge for your late Ancient Age Units fighting against them, did anybody experience this?
 
I feel really bad for you sebsage....
 
Because everyone has made fun of and put down your scenario so badly, its really uncalled for. I'm sure you put alot of hard work into it.
 
Well, I guess NeoMega changed his/her mind, look under the post;
"Last edited by Neomega on Feb 19, 2003 at 03:17 PM"
Apparently he changed what he formerly said, it praised it the first time...
 
Apparently so...I'll take a look at it later, I'm sure its not as bad as people are making it out to be.
 
Back
Top Bottom