Should we add more late game buildings?

[CppMaster]

The core issue though is that the happiness system is based on needs across all categories

Yeah, that's a good insight. How about if unhappiness was from only 2 sources that are best for the city? That way cities can be specialised without much happiness penalty.

 

[pochesun]

No to buildings.
But there should be something done with OP scouts, exploring the map too fast.
Also, increase cost of military upkeep relatively to current income and overall make late game win conditions way more difficult to achieve.

 

[Aquila SPQR]

Yes, please. Late game is terribly boring with almost nothing to build. Bad for those who just like immersion and don't race to win.

 

[Stalker0]

It’s a bit overwhelming to ask about integrating all of these. Surely some ideas are stronger than others. I don’t think it’s productive to present this as an omnibus.

Agreed, especially since we haven't yet seen what the newly 4UC is going to look like in terms of overall gameplay. We are ingesting a massive change to the game, so to vote on another just feels extremely premature.

 

[hokath]

Just to be clear, we wouldn't vote on this until a congress, after 4UC has gone through all its phases.
I'm not proposing a special session.

So on the principle of new buildings @Stalker0, at some later date, are you for or against?