Ok so I've been playing civ since the original block graphic game. I've recently gotten into Civ5 . Currently I've moved up from King into Immortal difficulty level. I play Alexander more to do with my cultural heritage as opposed to any strategic consideration. I also play normal play speed.
Ok now to my question ... I have been using the strategy akin to a OOC situation building up a super city and settling a second city around 90-100 turns .
Doing this I'm usually able to build a very productive city and rushing to renaissance - industrial ages well ahead of others. Im usually able to defend against the first DoW and quickly take them out with superior tech .
In my current immortal game it is also working but my huge concern is it doesn't sit right with me. It seems to me to be the wrong way of doing things and I am concerned it will not work in Emperor or above.
I'd love to know what people at my level and above are doing as an opening 100 turns strategy. Am I doing something wrong. I've found it easy to build a very tall empire with very little cities that outdoes the AI. Perhaps though I need to learn to widen it up a bit .
It isn't unusual to win a game with only two or three settled cities right up to king level. I'd love to get some ideas or feedback from others. Do I indeed need to be able to settle more cities or is it a case of it isn't broken don't fix it.
Ok now to my question ... I have been using the strategy akin to a OOC situation building up a super city and settling a second city around 90-100 turns .
Doing this I'm usually able to build a very productive city and rushing to renaissance - industrial ages well ahead of others. Im usually able to defend against the first DoW and quickly take them out with superior tech .
In my current immortal game it is also working but my huge concern is it doesn't sit right with me. It seems to me to be the wrong way of doing things and I am concerned it will not work in Emperor or above.
I'd love to know what people at my level and above are doing as an opening 100 turns strategy. Am I doing something wrong. I've found it easy to build a very tall empire with very little cities that outdoes the AI. Perhaps though I need to learn to widen it up a bit .
It isn't unusual to win a game with only two or three settled cities right up to king level. I'd love to get some ideas or feedback from others. Do I indeed need to be able to settle more cities or is it a case of it isn't broken don't fix it.