Statement regarding PI #7

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally posted by Shaitan
I'm sorry that I missed this thread as I was out for a couple of days. My opinion is that Rain did not violate the Constitution. The article she is accused of violating specifies that the At-Large Council is responsible for polling on Council Issues, i.e. Council Votes. Although she is responsible for responding to poll requests according to other articles of the constitution she was not in violation of the one she is accused of breaking.

Once she posted the poll for the council vote, the charges were dropped. Initially, she had refused.
 
Originally posted by Shaitan
It was a bad post. I had posted my message before reading all of the facts. It's hard to get a handle on some of this stuff after being absent for a few days.

No problem. That issue, at least, was resolved relatively easily.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom