donsig
Low level intermediary
I agree that we need cities to the SE and SW of Fox Nest but there's also a spot NW of Eyr that must be settled. Trying to make three settler right now would severly hamper our defensive (spearmen) production.
Originally posted by donsig
I agree that we need cities to the SE and SW of Fox Nest but there's also a spot NW of Eyr that must be settled. Trying to make three settler right now would severly hamper our defensive (spearmen) production.
I really think that we would do best to continue with settlers now, and attack the Americans when we have run out of room to expand. There is still much unsettled territory around us.
We're laying smack bet a few civs. If we move in one direction (against America), what if another neighbouring civ attk (like now)? What if the Americans get another civ to attk us in the rear? Fr experience, this is almost a sure thing. Are we going to take this gamble?Originally posted by Charis
This point is I think missed by Knight-Dragon's line:
"Before we can start any offense, obviously our own cities must be adequately defended and garrisoned"
NOT Obviously, I would maintain. If Babylons had not declared war there would be no need for spears or any defense off the American border at all. They will be scrambled to fend us off, in vain, while we march in and take DC, NY, Philly. They're not coming anywhere near our backline cities.
I will see to it that we build spearmen somewhere.
Originally posted by donsig
The Iroquois Ohwell, not the Indians!
This isn't in the presidential thread yet - turn chat is happening now. I'm bringing you live updates.![]()
We have an embassy with the Aztecs now.
EDIT: No word yet on how big America is.