People here, especially Americans, often make fun of European countries and their commitment to peacekeeping and such. France is usually their target. Called Eurowhiner and such. "Does France have enough white flags to go to war?"
But did you know that France have 33,000 troops deployed abroad?
Bosnia, Kosovo, Haiiti, Afghanistan, various places in Africa - It's not that France never did anything to help out. French and American troops coorporated in the first golf war, in Afghanistan, in Yugoslavia and in Haitii. And now because of a single war - Iraq, they are the subject of your not-so-funny slandering. Im not so fond of being an American ally, then. I mean, should I risk my life for you, and the first time we have an disagreement, have thrown mud at me?
Or what about the whole "Surrender monkey" deal. Do you even realise that the Germans ran over everyone in that fase of WWII? Britain was saved because of the canal, not because they fought better than the French. Indeed they were pushed back and forced to evacuate at Dunkirk. France did not have that option, but kept on fighting till 92.000 of their troops had died and defeat was certain. After that the Free French and the Resistance fought well against the Germans.
Or in that other thread, when it was said that Denmark would provide two ships, MobBoss wrote:
But did you know that France have 33,000 troops deployed abroad?
Bosnia, Kosovo, Haiiti, Afghanistan, various places in Africa - It's not that France never did anything to help out. French and American troops coorporated in the first golf war, in Afghanistan, in Yugoslavia and in Haitii. And now because of a single war - Iraq, they are the subject of your not-so-funny slandering. Im not so fond of being an American ally, then. I mean, should I risk my life for you, and the first time we have an disagreement, have thrown mud at me?
Or what about the whole "Surrender monkey" deal. Do you even realise that the Germans ran over everyone in that fase of WWII? Britain was saved because of the canal, not because they fought better than the French. Indeed they were pushed back and forced to evacuate at Dunkirk. France did not have that option, but kept on fighting till 92.000 of their troops had died and defeat was certain. After that the Free French and the Resistance fought well against the Germans.
Or in that other thread, when it was said that Denmark would provide two ships, MobBoss wrote:
Dude, do you realise that the only reason Denmark dosn't provide ground troops, is that we already have all our troops in Afghanistan and in Iraq? We have supplied 1300 first class troops for overseas service, for years now. That's a alot for a small country. Thanks alot, America! Let me go fight for you, let me risk me and my comrades life in some desert, while you slander and make fun of me!MobBoss said:Simply staggering support from these two UN giants. Staggering.
This is pretty much why the UN fails. Without the backbone of the USA and Britain, they pretty much devolve into something with a backbone the consistency of spaghetti. The military force listed here is more likely to join Hezbolla than disarm them.