Flavor Dave
Warlord
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2001
- Messages
- 146
One thing that has struck me about Civ 3 compared to 2 is that there are a couple of lulls in the game, when you've built everything in all of your cities given the available techs, and there isn't any open space. The first precedes the industrial era. When you get to that, you start getting some techs, so you can build some new improvements, but then you max them out and wait for the space race.
On the one hand, I suppose you could go to war. But I thought one of the "changes" in Civ 3 was that it was supposed to be easier to be peaceful. I mean, look at the new ways to victory...culture and diplomatic winning.
OTOH, if you don't go to war, you can't use capitalization, at least, not very effectively. What should you do, then? What do you guys do? I'm playing Regent level right now.
And with corruption like it is, going far afield to build new cities is pointless.
Given how bad the effect is for me, how extreme, and how boring the game is, I'm wondering if there's something I'm missing.
On the one hand, I suppose you could go to war. But I thought one of the "changes" in Civ 3 was that it was supposed to be easier to be peaceful. I mean, look at the new ways to victory...culture and diplomatic winning.
OTOH, if you don't go to war, you can't use capitalization, at least, not very effectively. What should you do, then? What do you guys do? I'm playing Regent level right now.
And with corruption like it is, going far afield to build new cities is pointless.
Given how bad the effect is for me, how extreme, and how boring the game is, I'm wondering if there's something I'm missing.