Kouvb593kdnuewnd
Left Forever
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2012
- Messages
- 4,146
That doesn't make sense because you say they aren't great as military units (which they are very powerful) but they shouldn't destroy units... Without the unit destruction or city destruction then it's just a thing that causes some annoying terrain damage.
Sent from my iPod touch using Tapatalk
I have said before, they should be great vs cities, but not the unit killers they are in the game, civ 4 had the same problem 2-3 nukes = whole stack gone making but that made more sense than they do in civ 5 OUPT.
Bombers should also be able to heavly damage cities but not that great against units atleast not the pre stealth ones.
Both nukes and bombers should be able to destroy improvements.
Nukes advantage over bombers would be fallout and lower cost but disadvantage would be the need of manhatan project, both should have very sever effect on reputation if used against cities.