JFD
Kathigitarkh
In preparation of the New Era, are there any new mods that I should be supporting with my civs?
In preparation of the New Era, are there any new mods that I should be supporting with my civs?
The Future Worlds mod perhaps? I'd understand if you didn't want to tackle that one however.
If it isn't already, I would say support for Renaissance Era Revised.
Special Forces upgrade for Marine, by Kramer. That would be great for Putin's UU to upgrade to.
Otherwise, I'll use Augustus'.
But the question remains: will the capital be Rome or Constantinople? And will the latter be called Byzantium, Nova Roma or Constantinople? (Please not the third option, it's the least accurate and only happened after he died).
Surely you mean "Theodora's but with Rome plopped at the beginning"?
seriously though if you do have to resort to using Augustus' at least add in Constantinople as the second city
Source? Wiki has conflicting accounts.
No it wouldn't? Constantine was emperor of all Rome, not just the eastern half which is representend in Byzantium's city list. It doesn't even include Ravenna!Oh yeah, she exists. That would make more sense.
No it wouldn't? Constantine was emperor of all Rome, not just the eastern half which is representend in Byzantium's city list. It doesn't even include Ravenna!
Oh and yeah, his capital should definitely be Rome. Byzantium wouldn't acquire prominency until later after his death.
Both are close to his time, as he ruled the entire empire. Fouding Constantinople does not make him an eastern Roman emperor, I admittedly get very annoyed when people imply so when discussing Constantine. Which is why I was triggered into stopping lurking to post now.But it's still closer to his time. And emphasizes the probable focus.
While a new city list do would be the best choice, I only contest that Byzantium's city list would fit more than Rome's. The Roman city list ignores much of the empire outside Italy, yes, but that makes sense as it is above all a Roman Civilization and Italy is its birthplace. So it is a non-arbitrary restriction to the scope of that city list that makes very much sense. The Byzantine city list however is ill-suited for a full roman empire as it blatantly ignores half of the empire Constantine ruled in an arbitrary way, as at the time of Constantine there was no disparity between eastern and western halves.Obviously, the ideal solution is for a unique City List, which maintains these aspects, but it would make more sense to go with Theodora, as Constantinople will most likely be the capital - ergo, less work![]()
Both are close to his time, as he ruled the entire empire. Fouding Constantinople does not make him an eastern Roman emperor, I admittedly get very annoyed when people imply so when discussing Constantine. Which is why I was triggered into stopping lurking to post now.![]()
While a new city list do would be the best choice, I only contest that Byzantium's city list would fit more than Rome's. The Roman city list ignores much of the empire outside Italy, yes, but that makes sense as it is above all a Roman Civilization and Italy is its birthplace. So it is a non-arbitrary restriction to the scope of that city list that makes very much sense. The Byzantine city list however is ill-suited for a full roman empire as it blatantly ignores half of the empire Constantine ruled in an arbitrary way, as at the time of Constantine there was no disparity between eastern and western halves.