Meant about what ashendashin said tbh re. "Not much besides the usual stuff on individual civs when it comes to mod portrayal," which i think is a bit dismissive and unfair. But glad you'll join, hopefully we can get some VP-related content into the July issue :happytibs:
Sorry, tried to make it come off as more descriptive than a snipe but that is my impression. Been reading since the first and I've found the sections on the state of modding in general to be the only reason I read these, so I skim a lot. I hope you get some writers from Civ4 conversion modders/users as that's something that might stand out to me. Adding to the base game ain't my thing for Civ5/6 at least.
I'd come up with something for VP but I haven't been playing and it's changed quite a bit since I have.
I should probably be more supportive, but since the start the rather literal civ-centric focus of CMM came off as bizzare to me. Haven't said anything though since I imagine getting old-timers from massive mods isn't as easy or entirely reflective of the current modding communities.
Edit:
I mean, you even have your JFDLC getting referenced across issues yet I barely know anything about it.
Edit 2:
Huh, you started a CMM thread at CPP before I ever did. Thought about it doing it but couldn't stop myself from highlighting what I just said here
