onejayhawk
Afflicted with reason
I thought the topic was the 2020 ele.ction, like it says in the title.I . . . what? The topic of discussion here was whether Ross Perot cost Bush the '92 election. Post 36 says nothing on this topic.
As soon as someone agrees with me, I need to correct myself.Now this I actually tend to agree with... which incidentally also seems to indicate that you agree with about Perot. Is that correct?
There is a Democrat with the necessary Charisma, Peter "Mayor Pete" Buttigieg. This is not only relevant but important because Buttigieg is one of only three candidates with double digits in IA and NH. Normally, I would say it's too early to look at polls, but those states get serious early.
As to Perot, I do believe that he was necessary for Bill Clinton to overtake GHW Bush. I particular, Perot threw Bush off stride in the first debate. Thereafter Clinton was able dominate the debate and change the momentum of the race. Clinton needed an opening which Perot provided.
J