Of course I support helping those people and of course I support removing dictatorships. However, George W. Bush's invasion was not motivated by empathy for the people. It is because of this that when he invaded, he did not do any planning to make sure that things would be better for civilians. It is exactly because of the fact that the motive to remove the dictator was profit that mroe civilians are dying per year now than before the invasion. However, things like uprisings, for example, are motivated by the want for liberty and freedom, and almost always end in greater living conditions. When removing dictators is motivated by the want for freedom and liberty and not the want for profit, things do not end up degenerating into a worse situation like they have in Iraq.
I remember reading an article that Iraq was on the verge of a revolution immidiately before the U.S. invaded. If that had happened instead of a U.S. invasion motivated by oil profits, things would be much better in Iraq than they are now.