(6-VT) Allow city states to capitulate instead of capturing them

[Diomedes_]

That's fair, but I think @stii's idea of having influence for all other players knocked back to zero is a better option than making them a vassal.

 

[alchx]

Spheres of influence are too strong.

It might be better to have any influence above 60 drop to 60 upon CS surrender and reset all issued quests for any player. It turns out that none of CS's defenders could come to the rescue, but CS retains the memory of past good relations. For a former ally, you can increase the rate at which influence decreases by 1.5 times for 20 turns.

Also, when CS capitulates, you can reduce the chances of destroying buildings or destroy only walls, castles and the like, so that CS in the late game can start building up a new army for his defense, instead of building forges and circuses. 10 units will most likely be produced in at least 20 turns. Plus CS needs to produce workers, repair damage and build new buildings.

 

[Recursive]

Proposal vetoed.
Reason:

(add such option at city state menu when city-state is loosing or when city is captured).

As N i consider some balanced number, but lack enough balancing knowledge for it.

Contains optional and unspecified elements.