Jesus also said judge not lest you be judged and do onto others as you would have them do onto you. People who discriminate are not followers of Jesus.
1 “Do not judge, or you too will be judged.
2 For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you.
3 “Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye?
4 How can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the speck out of your eye,’ when all the time there is a plank in your own eye?
5 You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye.- Matt 7:1-5
He was warning hypocrites about judging others
“If another believer sins, rebuke that person; then if there is repentance, forgive. Even if that person wrongs you seven times a day and each time turns again and asks forgiveness, you must forgive.” - Luke 17:1-4
And urging his followers to judge with righteousness...But this is all aside from the issue, many Christians, Muslims, Jews, etc, oppose gay marriage on religious grounds and dont want to be forced to participate. I can understand that... If we can compel a baker who is creating the cake can we compel a priest to sanctify the marriage? If not, why?
Some Pharisees came and tested him by asking, “Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife?”
3 “What did Moses command you?” he replied.
4 They said, “Moses permitted a man to write a certificate of divorce and send her away.”
5 “It was because your hearts were hard that Moses wrote you this law,” Jesus replied.
6 “But at the beginning of creation God ‘made them male and female.’
7 ‘For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife,
8 and the two will become one flesh.’So they are no longer two, but one flesh.
9 Therefore what God has joined together, let no one separate.”- Mark 10:2-9
I think Berzerker's problem with segregation wasn't that it had a discriminatory effect on black people, it was that it forced property owners to discriminate even if they didn't want to (even though basically all of them wanted to).
I see both as problems but I dont see opinion polls to support "basically all of them". If all of them wanted segregation they didn't need a law. Not everyone would have segregated if they were free and thats why the laws were passed. They didn't want a competitive market deciding if segregation should exist because they'd lose.
That's exactly how whataboutism works.
Whataboutism (also known as whataboutery) is a variant of the tu quoque logical fallacy that attempts to discredit an opponent's position by charging them with hypocrisy without directly refuting or disproving their argument
What is your argument? Can I agree with it and acknowledge Hillary's guilt or does your argument require me to ignore her guilt? When the Pharisees brought an adulteress before Jesus he charged her would-be executioners with hypocrisy. They didn't accuse Jesus of 'whataboutism' and cast their stones. Trump tried to get dirt on Hillary and Hillary did get dirt on Trump. Both are guilty, thats not 'whataboutism', thats just reality. Looks like a term invented by a hypocrite who got tired of people pointing to their hypocrisy. "How dare you call me a hypocrite as I cast stones at others! Thats whataboutism!"