Cumulative Ancient World Quiz

Thuloid

King of Esquiland
Joined
Dec 3, 2001
Messages
138
Location
Here
Mauryan Emprire -> Seleucid Empire -> Parthians -> Sassanids _> Byzantine Empire -> Ottoman Empire->Russia->France->Mexico->Republic of Texas

There. I know that one works.
 

SeleucusNicator

Diadoch
Joined
Aug 25, 2002
Messages
6,822
Location
America
Very good. That 9 links; the same as the one that I came up with, which was:

Mauryrans -> Seleucids -> Romans -> Vandals -> Byzantines -> Ottomans -> Russians -> France -> Mexico -> Texas

I'm not sure if it can be done in less than 9, but I'll leave the question open for a few more hours just in case.
 

SeleucusNicator

Diadoch
Joined
Aug 25, 2002
Messages
6,822
Location
America
That depends on your definition of "France", I suppose. What we recognize as France was certainly never at war with the Roman Empire.
 

Pangur Bán

Deconstructed
Joined
Jan 19, 2002
Messages
9,021
Location
Transtavia
Originally posted by SeleucusNicator
That depends on your definition of "France", I suppose. What we recognize as France was certainly never at war with the Roman Empire.

There are numerous wars between Frankia or later vassals of the French crown and the Byzantine Empire.
 

SeleucusNicator

Diadoch
Joined
Aug 25, 2002
Messages
6,822
Location
America
That there were, but the Byzantine Empire was never at war with the Seleucids.

To link Seleucia to the Byzantines would require two more links. However, even that puts you at 8, making you the winner so far.
 

Pangur Bán

Deconstructed
Joined
Jan 19, 2002
Messages
9,021
Location
Transtavia
Originally posted by SeleucusNicator
That there were, but the Byzantine Empire was never at war with the Seleucids.

To link Seleucia to the Byzantines would require two more links. However, even that puts you at 8, making you the winner so far.

The Romans were at war with the Seleucids. The Byzantine Empire is the same state as the Roman Empire. Now, while one may argue that the Byzantine Empire differs remarkably from the Roman Republic, no historian would say it was a different state. That makes the answer 6 ;)
 

Thuloid

King of Esquiland
Joined
Dec 3, 2001
Messages
138
Location
Here
If we can say that about France and Rome, then I can do this---Mauryans->Seleucids->Romans->Spain->Mexico->Texas

And tie the 6.
 

Pangur Bán

Deconstructed
Joined
Jan 19, 2002
Messages
9,021
Location
Transtavia
Originally posted by Thuloid
If we can say that about France and Rome, then I can do this---Mauryans->Seleucids->Romans->Spain->Mexico->Texas

And tie the 6.

When was Spain at war with the Romans?
 

Thuloid

King of Esquiland
Joined
Dec 3, 2001
Messages
138
Location
Here
I'm making a (tenuous) connection between the Visigothic kingdom and modern Spain via the kingdom of Asturias (founded by a remnant Visigothic nobility). To me, that's at least as valid as connecting a Frankish kingdom or some vassals of medieval France to the government of Napoleon III.
 

Pangur Bán

Deconstructed
Joined
Jan 19, 2002
Messages
9,021
Location
Transtavia
Originally posted by Thuloid
I'm making a (tenuous) connection between the Visigothic kingdom and modern Spain via the kingdom of Asturias (founded by a remnant Visigothic nobility). To me, that's at least as valid as connecting a Frankish kingdom or some vassals of medieval France to the government of Napoleon III.

Visigothic kingdom of Spain was a completely different kingdom from the late med. kingdom of Spain, which was effectively the Kingdom of Castille, united with Leon and then Aragon. The French kingdom existed in continuity from the 9th century. It is not the same thing.
 

Thuloid

King of Esquiland
Joined
Dec 3, 2001
Messages
138
Location
Here
That depends entirely on what we mean by "completely different" and "continuity". You say that the French kingdom of the 9th century and post-Revolution France are part of the same continuum--I can easily say they're completely different.
 

Pangur Bán

Deconstructed
Joined
Jan 19, 2002
Messages
9,021
Location
Transtavia
Originally posted by Thuloid
That depends entirely on what we mean by "completely different" and "continuity". You say that the French kingdom of the 9th century and post-Revolution France are part of the same continuum--I can easily say they're completely different.

Yes, you can easily say they are different. But you haven't given any arguments in support, and that's the imp[ortant point. ;)
 

Mongoloid Cow

Great Khan
Joined
Dec 18, 2001
Messages
2,816
Location
Adelaide, Australia
I don't think the Mauryan Empire went to war with the Seleucid Empire either, the Seleucids sold them their Indian possessions for 500 war elephants. Bactria could be put between the two for a link.
 

SeleucusNicator

Diadoch
Joined
Aug 25, 2002
Messages
6,822
Location
America
Seleucus sold that land because he was defeated in battle and wished to save face. He attacked Chandragupta and had plans to colonize northern India. The conflict lasted about 3 years, iirc, and I think Chandragupta also recieved a wife or two out of the deal.

[edit] Linkage to back that up [/edit]
 

Porphyrogenitos

Γένοιος Όιος έσαι μαθών
Joined
Mar 14, 2003
Messages
230
Location
Byzantium
What was the sacred line around Rome which no troops or general in command of troops supposed to cross called?
 

Constantine

at least it isnt the sens
Joined
Dec 9, 2002
Messages
1,912
Location
Toronto, Canuckistan
Rubicon?
 

Porphyrogenitos

Γένοιος Όιος έσαι μαθών
Joined
Mar 14, 2003
Messages
230
Location
Byzantium
No that was a river (stream is more apt) far north of Rome. I am referring to the actual city of Rome.
 
Top Bottom