warpus
In pork I trust
bhavv that seems really cheap, how big is that portion?
That's for nutrition. You seriously can't tell me with a straight face that's the reason for the initiative that's the topic of this thread.
It seems though this wasn't enacted to throw the pork industry a bone (HA) but it was intended to instead basically be this local government's way of thumbing its nose at Muslims and Jewish people. Which is silly.
How can you tell?
Originally posted by Article
The council members said that their decision was an effort to preserve Danish identity and culture -- including pork meals which are consumed by most Danes.
There are plenty of American agricultural programs that serve multiple purposes like nutrition, economic, and cultural interests. I'm sure that's the case in many other countries as well. I don't know much of anything about Danish agriculture or culinary things, but if it is accurate that half of the agricultural export of the Danes is pork then it makes sense that pork would be cultural important to them.
Nor is there one here. It applies to public institutions, not private ones.
US public schools need to provide milk as an option in school lunches. Of course schools are not every public institution, but they are a fair portion of the ones that are going to have a food service component.
Yeah, next time I'll just click a button.Don't tell me what to do.
The best kind of policy, fulfilling multiple purposes.The Fresh Fruit and Vegetable program for school lunches was established under the 2002 Farm Bill as a means to support farmers.
Are they mandating them though?The USDA is advising schools to adopt culturally inclusive school lunches as well. New Jersey too. The USDA also has programs in place to help schools purchase local foods.
Of course with the most cursory analysis it will look the same. I am aware that they are all government edicts about food.The US government, and plenty of other national and local governments, have their fingers in our pies. Our food is regulated, taxed, and subsidized in manners that encourage certain foods and discourage certain foods for reasons that have nothing to do with nutrition or safety. The Danish proposal doesn't shock me because it isn't dissimilar to what plenty of other governments already do.
So I guess the question is.. if it's fine to make milk mandatory as an option in public schools in the U.S., is it fine to make pork mandatory in some other sort of public institutions elsewhere?
First of all the obvious facts: Nobody has a problem with the milk because Muslims love milk, or at the very least I assume they aren't forbidden from drinking it. I guess Hindus probably can't drink milk, and milk is also often associated with healthiness, and pork with the exact opposite..
So in conclusion this entire line of thought has been a waste of time. I bet it was even me who started talking about milk in the first place (But I am not actually taking credit for it in the case of it not actually being me, I can't remember a thing)
Don't tell me what to do.
RE milk - its healthy and essential for children. Its unhealthy and unnecessary for adults. As we age, our ability to digest milk diminishes, and as our bones are no longer growing, the nutrition provided from it is no longer needed.