I’ve been told, mainly from SJW circles, that belonging to the male gender means that I’m part of the oppressor class (which I strongly disagree with), that I should feel guilt not only because I’m a male, but because I’m white and straight. And because I’m a white straight male, that my options are to be invalidated and not taken into consideration. Even my feelings are to be invalidated because I’m a male. For me, it makes me feel alienated.
Personally, I do not like the current associated negative stereotypes attributed to males. One comes to mind is being assumed that I’m a sexist mysogonist pig for liking a picture of an attractive woman (or a fan art of a female character I like), or play a video game that features an attractive woman. This gives me the general impression that not only feminist hate men, but are prudish sex negative bunch.
There are many degrees of feminism. I consider myself one, but it's incorrect to say I (or even most feminists, in my opinion) hate men. I may hate certain kinds of men, or individual men, but not men in general. As I've said before, I've spent 15 years on this forum, that is mostly populated by men. If I hated men, how could I have lasted this long here? Why would I stay? Would I not have sought out the all-female forums and retreated to talk about husbands, babies, recipes, and soap operas? (been to a couple of those sites and they are horribly shallow, BORING places where not much discussion happens that's actually of interest to me)
The only female OT poster who actually has expressed a lot of general negativity about men isn't part of this thread. If she were to come and post such things, I would expect pushback, since that kind of negativity would not be in keeping with the OP and the fact that this is a Red Diamond thread. And it's rude anyway.
I honestly find it that women have it easier in terms of getting dates and not being a scapegoat in the current culture war. Where as men have to face rejection or at worse rape allegations and end up being scapegoated.
Have you talked to any women about this? You might be surprised at the answers.
I think there needs to be a conversation around toxic masculinity (which was originally coined by a male to describe acts of masculinity that harmed the man or others around him) and what is and isn't "manly". You're not any less of a man if you don't enjoy sports or drink beer or exercise or like pink or aren't strong, etc.
Human males used to wear really flashy, colorful clothes as a matter of course, while the women were expected to dress more modestly. And yes, the men wore pink. That was long before it was considered a "girl's color."
This mimics nature, particularly birds. The flashiest, most colorful birds are the males, in most species. With penguins, you have to guess in a lot of cases since the colors are identical, but generally the males might be slightly taller. Maybe. You can't even tell for sure by watching to see which half of the couple is looking after the chick, because parenting is a 50/50 thing with penguins, and some couples are same-sex and are raising an abandoned or stolen chick.
I also don't get that watching sports is manly . The only sport I was remotely interested in was ping-pong
I still can't figure out why that's an official Olympic sport but ballroom dancing isn't. You have to be in very good physical condition to do ballroom dancing at the professional competitive level.
It will never be the same as a woman wanting a hug. A lonely dude wanting a hug is the least likely to get it. Cause wanting a hug is all mixed up w wanting sex and wanting the comfort of a woman's arms and when you need something that primal its very hard to get. When you don't need it you project confidence and it's much easier to get. Part of the dilemma of manhood
I'm reminded of a couple of guys I knew who were regulars at the science fiction conventions I went to back in the '80s and '90s. One of them was a really nice guy named Steve Forty (yes, his real name), but his nickname was "Huggable Steve". He enjoyed hugging people, but he never automatically assumed he had permission. He always asked first, and he was very good at hugging and cheering people up.
Contrast that to a different guy who I've mentioned a time or two here - who went around giving women backrubs - without asking permission. He just acted like he was entitled to do it, and wouldn't leave me alone (he'd do this anywhere - in the consuite, in a panel room, on the mezzanine) until I yelled at him in front of everyone, in a crowded hallway, to STOP, I'd already told him twice not to do that, and I really didn't want him to touch me. He tried arguing that "nobody else minds" and didn't get that that's not the point. It's a good thing for him that he did stop; my next step would have been con security and he'd have been thrown out of the convention.
IMO some of the gender roles are ok, as long as people enjoy them and they are not enforced. Things like giving flowers to a woman, wearing man/woman clothes or helping the weak, like you mentioned, are harmless and don't necessarily have to be abolished. The world where all genders look and behave identically, wouldn't be very fun to live.
Agreed up to a point. Don't assume everyone wants flowers. Some people have allergies, so before buying or sending flowers, try to find out if the intended recipient has any allergies. It's not fun having to refuse or discard a gift that would literally make a person sick (I try to be gracious about it when given treats that have nuts in them, or scented stuff - they're quietly disposed of in some way... my dad didn't mind getting the Peanut Buster Parfait one of my typing clients gave me as a tip, and the scented candle I got from my boyfriend was never taken out of the wrapper - it's pretty to look at, but I don't dare breathe around it).