Yes, BTW, we ARE aware of Smith & his rather accurate propositions... why do U think no one wants to help massively expanding, BIG #1 Leader's civs?
Of course your closing of borders just because i too want/need mid-continent resources, is NOT conductive to free trade.
Rep ImpK seems to think because my
Portuguese settlers are well-escorted to prevent his double-move Gallic Warriors & assorted other melee units from wiping out MY new city(ies*), that means something else. Do i sense paranoia?
* BTW, U will be happy to know i had 2 settlers on the way to create TWO cites...BUT your 3 (4?) new land-grabbing instant cities prevented my Ports from doing so.
Since i DO have a fair amount of strength in the area & you
HAVE pushed your civs WAY beyond others as far tech, wonders, Grt People, perhaps it is U that should consider gifting a couple(?) of them to me & your other neighbors that U have so brazenly grabbed land from.
I strongly suggest U make such a gracious gesture very soon. To quote thee:
" Turn around before you do something you'll regret."
Trade embargos & closed borders are SO very costly & un-Adam Smithish. Especially for BIG, bloated, expensive, over-expanding civs.
Your move. Consider carefully your options & the future of our previously prosperous trading.