Firestorm94
zuh?
I'm wondering, should i get Civ Rev DS, it seems ok, but i don't want to throw money away. any1?
I love Age of Empires/Kings for the DS - a decent turn based version of AoE.
McCaul: Yes, that number is set in stone. There are 16 civs, and the game core is the same from DS to 360 and PS3, so you won't see many differences there. It's the presentation on DS that is where things really change. All the combat and city screens are defnitley at a different pace and cadence than the console versions.
I found this interesting bullet point on the DS Civ Rev website. Regarding 'Game of the Week' a downloadable weekly maps feature for the DS, it says:
"compete against players online as you play on the same map on the PS3 and 360"
That's fantastic!Small clarification for those of you who are confused.
The DS gets the EXACT same game of the week situation every week as the consoles, but the DS is not ranked (no leaderboards).
And yes, it is running the same game core as the larger Consoles, only with a different presentation layer.
They ran out of resources. CivRev was developed in house and Firaxis didn't have enough man power to devote resources to 4 versions at the same time. They also didn't want to farm the game out so it was "delayed".Quick question. Why happened to the Wii version?
Small clarification for those of you who are confused.
The DS gets the EXACT same game of the week situation every week as the consoles, but the DS is not ranked (no leaderboards).
I'd rather not get the DS version. The DS Graphics are awful and gameplay with it is severely limited. I'm scared to see what Civ will look like on a DS. If given the choice, get it for the Xbox or PS3, but not the DS.