Armor (Veteran)
Warlord
Turn 144 to Rodrigo:
http://bkgrila.com:8000/Yamato_AD-0144_to_Rodrigo.CivBeyondSwordSave
http://bkgrila.com:8000/Yamato_AD-0144_to_Rodrigo.CivBeyondSwordSave
Well, looking at the past, India and America have always been able to keep a non-aggression status, have always respected themselves and have even cooperated together, which I think have benefited both nations to increase their power and achieve their objectives.
I'm also fine in ending the game, providing that Armor also agrees to it. However, if we are going to end the game, India shall be declared the winner. The production rate of America is slight above the production rate of India, but India still has a much larger army and earns more money. The battle for Japan took a heavy tool in lost units, but now India will keep a steady production rate of units and the power gap will be stable.
Concerning Russia, I agree. It will take a huge amount of resources (like it happened with Japan) to beat Russia and with little benefit in the end. Only a joint effort India/America at the moment would be the more balanced option.
So, my proposal:
1. We will end the game and India is declared the winner.
2. We engage in war (this is a total war scenario), but we have a cease fire period of some turns (max 5) to prepare and re position our huge armies. Like in the old "Highlander" movie, in the end, there can be only one.
America took heavy hit over the years in attacking Japan, thus allowing India to develop infrastructure and military. so America needs recognition for that sacrifice.
k thanks for clarification on that.GPS to Hercules.
The cease fire will end in turn 152. On Turn 152 America may start the hostilities. Turn 153 for India.