Recent content by balthazaar

Why no "enormous size" earth map?? The "greatest earth map" is too small and "giant earth map" is too big! There is nothing in between! Why?

Can someone throw a screenshot of the new Events UI and the spy system?? I've just no time to test for few days!!

I stopped using other mods since I posted this and hadn't once seen the problem until yesterday when I re-installed Really advanced set-up to get rid of the damn Inca but it has me scratching my head :confused: How is it even possible that RAS could interfere with trading?? It's the same as...

If I settle on cow, wheat and other such resources does the city get the extra food??

Here's a thought... If civs A & B are at war and B is winning and Civ C wants peace, then civ B should have to ask civ A if it accepts. If civ A does accept then civ B gets whatever deal civ C was offering... if not, the war continues. Probably a coding nightmare but I wouldn't know. If it's...

It doesn't have to be removed but players should have the ability to deny peace or at the very least be actually LOSING the war ie has lost cities, all its army and is hemorrhaging gold etc. At present it's just much too easy for an AI to force peace and it's almost always an unjust peace.

Yeah, that would at least make sense. The player should be the judge of who is winning the war instead of it being based on war-score numbers which are almost always flawed as to what is actually happening in a war.

Yes they are, that is the WHOLE point. Civ A is at war with civ B and Civ C comes along and forces a peace on both parties. Me being Civ A does not want peace with Civ B no matter the scenario.. so why am I forced to listen to Civ C?? It's ridiculous. Yes and it would be great if that was the...

Don't just claim you know something I don't, give ONE example. It's really easy, no nation HAS to make peace with any other nation against it's will. It's not that difficult to understand.

Good luck with that. It has never occurred in history that a third party has forced peace on another nation, they ALWAYS had a choice... even if that choice was being nuked :) Imagine if during WW2 some random nation just started declaring peace all over the place!:ar15::deal:.... :eek2:

Yeah, haven't been offered DoW in a long time. I also can't seem to convince an AI to join a war or go to war no matter what I do.... even if a friendly AI is guarded it doesn't seem to matter. I have noticed that they're opportunists though and will declare war on civs being annihilated.

Ethiopia & India because of their religious zeal!

Yep, totally agree. There has never been a scenario in history where a third party has declared peace on behalf of a nation unwilling for peace. It just makes no sense whatsoever :confused: Maybe if there was some-kind of counter which for example added -10 relations with all civs everytime...

Yeah, religion is definitely MUCH tougher to spread with VP :assimilate: A possible solution is to get a great prophet and a few missionaries into Shaka to convert him away from Shinto then declare war on other civs with the Shinto religion and never make peace until Shinto is weak. I'm pretty...

imo EUI has been around for so long now and has so much work behind it that a change would be unnecessary. That being said I'm not tied to EUI. If your creation was as streamlined and useful then I'd have no problem with a change. Btw, [civ1]6 is just around the corner so there's going to be...